Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Accuracy evaluation of static guided implant placement using an intraoral scan method].

Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology·2024

Same author

Influence of different base materials and thicknesses on the fracture resistance of endocrown: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

BMC oral health·2022

Same author

[Nonradiological methods for implant surgical guide accuracy measurement].

Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology·2021

Same author

[Preliminary study of Simplant software in mandibular molar implantation].

Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology·2016

Same author

[Establishment of traumatic occlusion model in Sprague-Dawley rats].

Shanghai kou qiang yi xue = Shanghai journal of stomatology·2016

Same author

An Analysis of the Proximity of Maxillary Posterior Teeth to the Maxillary Sinus Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.

Journal of endodontics·2015

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

[Research of implant accuracy using a digital registration method].

Mei-Fei Lian¹, Xiu-Yin Zhang, Tian-Hong Tang

¹Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China.

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue = Shanghai Journal of Stomatology

|October 7, 2023

Summary

A new digital registration method accurately assesses dental implant placement, showing no significant difference compared to traditional cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Measuring the Complete-arch Distortion of an Optical Dental Impression

Published on: May 30, 2019

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

Area of Science:

Dental Implantology
Medical Imaging
Surgical Accuracy Assessment

Context:

Accurate dental implant placement is crucial for successful outcomes.
Traditional methods like cone beam CT (CBCT) are established but may have limitations.
Evaluating new, potentially more efficient methods for accuracy assessment is ongoing.

Purpose:

Introduce and evaluate a novel digital registration method for assessing dental implant position accuracy.
Compare the clinical accuracy of the digital registration method against the conventional CBCT method.
Determine if the digital registration method is a viable alternative for clinical use.

Summary:

This study compared a digital registration method with cone beam CT (CBCT) for evaluating dental implant accuracy in 36 implants from 24 patients.
Measurements included deviations at occlusal and apical points, and angular deviation.
Results showed no statistically significant difference between the two methods (P>0.05).

Impact:

The digital registration method demonstrates comparable accuracy to CBCT for evaluating implant position.
This finding supports the acceptance of the digital registration method in clinical practice.
Potential for improved workflow or reduced radiation exposure in dental implantology.