Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Enhanced Yeast One-hybrid Screens To Identify Transcription Factor Binding To Human DNA Sequences
Published on: February 11, 2019
Transcription factor-binding k-mer analysis clarifies the cell type dependency of binding specificities and
Saeko Tahara1,2, Takaho Tsuchiya1,3, Hirotaka Matsumoto4,5
1Bioinformatics Laboratory, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan.
Background:
Transcription factors (TFs) exhibit heterogeneous DNA-binding specificities in individual cells and whole organisms under natural conditions, and de novo motif discovery usually provides multiple motifs, even from a single chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) sample. Despite the accumulation of ChIP-seq data and ChIP-seq-derived motifs, the diversity of DNA-binding specificities across different TFs and cell types remains largely unexplored.
Results:
Here, we applied MOCCS2, our k-mer-based motif discovery method, to a collection of human TF ChIP-seq samples across diverse TFs and cell types, and systematically computed profiles of TF-binding specificity scores for all k-mers. After quality control, we compiled a set of TF-binding specificity score profiles for 2,976 high-quality ChIP-seq samples, comprising 473 TFs and 398 cell types. Using these high-quality samples, we confirmed that the k-mer-based TF-binding specificity profiles reflected TF- or TF-family dependent DNA-binding specificities. We then compared the binding specificity scores of ChIP-seq samples with the same TFs but with different cell type classes and found that half of the analyzed TFs exhibited differences in DNA-binding specificities across cell type classes. Additionally, we devised a method to detect differentially bound k-mers between two ChIP-seq samples and detected k-mers exhibiting statistically significant differences in binding specificity scores. Moreover, we demonstrated that differences in the binding specificity scores between k-mers on the reference and alternative alleles could be used to predict the effect of variants on TF binding, as validated by in vitro and in vivo assay datasets. Finally, we demonstrated that binding specificity score differences can be used to interpret disease-associated non-coding single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as TF-affecting SNPs and provide candidates responsible for TFs and cell types.
Conclusions:
Our study provides a basis for investigating the regulation of gene expression in a TF-, TF family-, or cell-type-dependent manner. Furthermore, our differential analysis of binding-specificity scores highlights noncoding disease-associated variants in humans.
More Related Videos
09:58Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis
Published on: June 27, 2020
06:38High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
Published on: February 7, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Transcription Factors
General Transcription Factors
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators
Eukaryotic Transcription Activators
The binding domains are capable of recognizing and interacting with regulatory sequences on the DNA. These...
Master Transcription Regulators
The Eukaryotic Promoter Region