Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025
A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy
Published on: November 13, 2016
Evaluating the effect of spinal cord stimulation on patient with disorders of consciousness: A TMS-EEG study
Yong Wang1, Yuanyuan Dang2, Yang Bai3
1Zhuhai UM Science & Technology Research Institute, Zhuhai, 519031, China.
Objective:
The application of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of disorders of consciousness (DOC) has attracted attention, but its effect on brain activity is still unknown. Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with EEG (TMS-EEG) can measure cortical activity, which can evaluate the effect of SCS on DOC.
Methods:
We record 20 DOC patients' CRS-R values and TMS-EEG data before and after one-session SCS (Pre-SCS and Post-SCS). 20 DOC patients including 10 patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and 10 patients with minimally conscious states (MCS). TMS evoked potential (TEP) was used to measure the changes of cortical activity in DOC patients between Pre-SCS and Post-SCS. Firstly, we used the global mean field potential (GMFP) and fast perturbational complexity index (PCIst) to compare the temporal changes of patients' cortical activity. Then, we obtained the frequency feature (natural frequency, NF) based on the TEP time-frequency analysis, and compared the changes of natural frequency between Pre-SCS and Post-SCS. Finally, the study explored the relationship between the patient's baseline CRS-R values and changes of TMS evoked cortical activity in time and frequency domains.
Results:
After SCS, MCS and UWS groups almost have no changes of CRS-R values (MCS: 9.9 ± 1.52 at Pre-SCS, 10.2 ± 1.48 at Post-SCS; UWS: 5.6 ± 1.26 at Pre-SCS, 5.7 ± 1.34 at Post-SCS). MCS group showed significant increases of GMFP amplitude (around 100 ms and 300 ms) and PCIst values at Post-SCS (p < 0.05). UWS group had no significant changes (p > 0.05). Besides, SCS induced the significant increases of natural frequency for MCS group(p < 0.05), but not for UWS group. At last, the study found that all patient's baseline CRS-R values were significantly correlated with ΔPCIst (r = 0.67, p < 0.005), and ΔNF (r = 0.72, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
SCS can modulate cortical activity of DOC patient, including temporal complexity and natural frequency. The changes of cortical activity caused by SCS are related to patients' consciousness level. TMS-EEG can evaluate the effect of SCS on DOC patients.
