Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025
Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
Published on: July 5, 2011
Microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: Complications after 292 procedures without neurophysiological
Alejandro Serrano Rubio1, Héctor A Rodríguez-Rubio1, Rodrigo López-Rodríguez1
1Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
Background:
Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is characterized by involuntary, progressive, and intermittent spasms in the upper and lower facial muscles. Due to the high success rate, microvascular decompression (MVD) is the treatment of choice, and intraoperative neuromonitoring (INM) is considered useful for achieving safe surgery. Still, most centers do not have this technology.
Methods:
We analyzed 294 patients with HFS treated with MVD without INM. We only included patients with a neurovascular etiology while excluding other causes, such as tumors. As part of the postoperative evaluation, we assessed preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and pure-tone audiometry.
Results:
The main complication was peripheral facial paralysis in 50 patients, followed by hypoacusis in 22 patients and deafness in 17 patients, associated with a failed surgical outcome (P = 0.0002). The anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) was an offending vessel, and the involvement of more than one vessel was significantly associated with the development of facial nerve palsy (P = 0.01). AICA was also associated with hearing impairment (P = 0.04). Over 90% of immediate complications improve in the follow-up (6 months), and one patient did not show a cure for initial HFS.
Conclusion:
MVD is the method with the highest long-term cure rates for treating HFS; however, we must inquire into the multiple factors of the patient and the surgeon to predict surgical outcomes. INM is not a must during MVD for HFS. We recommend its use depending on the availability and mainly on the surgeon's skills, for surgeons.
