Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat Fragmentation

Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.

What is Conservation Biology?

What is Conservation Biology?

Conservation biology is a scientific field that focuses on the preservation of biodiversity in order to protect ecosystems while meeting the needs of the human population. Humans require properly functioning ecosystems to maintain our supply of natural resources, including food, medicines, and building materials.

Conservation of Declining Populations

Conservation of Declining Populations

Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.

Biodiversity and Human Values

Biodiversity and Human Values

Human civilization relies on biodiversity in many ways. Sudden changes in species biodiversity result in environmental changes that can modify weather patterns and therefore human civilizations.

Conservation of Small Populations

Conservation of Small Populations

Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...

Threats to Biodiversity

Threats to Biodiversity

There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Evolutionary Footprint: A Systemic Indicator in Evolution, Ecology and Conservation.

Evolutionary applications·2026

Same author

Inbreeding Depression Across Multiple Life-History Traits in a Long-Lived Mammal.

Molecular ecology·2025

Same author

Taxonomic and phylogenetic biases in translocated angiosperm plant species across European countries.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2025

Same author

Modeling of senescent cell dynamics predicts a late-life decrease in cancer incidence.

Evolutionary applications·2023

Same journal

Insights from three decades of IUCN Red List assessments catalyzing shark, ray, and chimaera conservation.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026

Same journal

Extreme site fidelity in long-distance migratory shorebirds in Australia and potential implications for conservation.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026

Same journal

Debate, pluralism, and power in epistemological violence: Reply to Simpson et al. (2026).

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026

Same journal

When everything is violence, nothing is violence: Response to Koot et al. (2020).

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026

Same journal

Key agroecosystems for the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Europe.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026

Same journal

What climate adaptation can learn from evolutionary adaptation.

Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Deploying Community Scientists to Conduct Nondestructive Genetic Sampling of Rare Butterfly Populations

Deploying Community Scientists to Conduct Nondestructive Genetic Sampling of Rare Butterfly Populations

Published on: October 28, 2022

Building references for nature conservation.

Alexandre Robert¹

¹Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Conservation Biology : the Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology

|October 9, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Establishing a common framework for conservation references is crucial for comparing past and present biodiversity. This framework ensures references are explicit, standardized, and based on dynamics, not fixed states, for better conservation outcomes.

Keywords:

anthropocene antropoceno baseline benchmark biodiversidad biodiversity ciencias de la conservación conservation science línea base referencia 人类世保护科学基准基线生物多样性

More Related Videos

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Published on: May 1, 2016

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 14, 2025

Deploying Community Scientists to Conduct Nondestructive Genetic Sampling of Rare Butterfly Populations

Deploying Community Scientists to Conduct Nondestructive Genetic Sampling of Rare Butterfly Populations

Published on: October 28, 2022

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Spotting Cheetahs: Identifying Individuals by Their Footprints

Published on: May 1, 2016

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

Area of Science:

Ecology
Conservation Biology
Environmental Science

Background:

Conservation biology relies on historical references to assess biodiversity changes.
Ancient references are often data-limited and may be irrelevant for human-modified ecosystems.
Confusing conservation references with objectives and diverse ethical viewpoints complicates their use.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a standardized framework for establishing conservation references.
To ensure comparability of references across studies and conservation projects.
To differentiate conservation references from conservation objectives.

Main Methods:

Developing a common framework for referencing past biological systems.
Emphasizing explicit, standardized, and transparent selection of references.
Basing references on state, pressure, or process dynamics rather than static states.

Main Results:

Current conservation references vary in meaning and message due to heterogeneity in nature and temporal baselines.
A unified framework allows for more consistent and comparable conservation assessments.
Recognizing diverse temporal baselines is key to understanding the biodiversity crisis.

Conclusions:

A common framework is essential for robust conservation biology.
Conservation references must be dynamic and clearly distinguished from objectives.
Understanding diverse temporal baselines is vital for addressing the biodiversity crisis.