Can a 12-gene expression signature predict the cell transforming potential of tumor promoting agents in Bhas 42...

To date, long-term rodent carcinogenesis assays are the only assays recognized by regulators to assess non-genotoxic carcinogens, but their reliability has been questioned. In vitro cell transformation assays (CTAs) could represent an interesting alternative to animal models as it has the advantage of detecting both genotoxic and non-genotoxic transforming chemicals. Among them, Bhas 42 CTA uses a cell line that has been transfected with the oncogenic sequence v-Ha-ras. This sequence confers an "initiated" status to these cells and makes them particularly sensitive to non-genotoxic agents. In a previous work, transcriptomic analysis revealed that the treatment of Bhas 42 cells with transforming silica (nano)particles and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) commonly modified the expression of 12 genes involved in cell proliferation and adhesion. In the present study, we assess whether this signature would be the same for four other soluble transforming agents, i.e. mezerein, methylarsonic acid, cholic acid and quercetin. The treatment of Bhas 42 cells for 48 h with mezerein modified the expression of the 12 genes of the signature according to the same profile as that of the TPA. However, methylarsonic acid and cholic acid gave an incomplete signature with changes in the expression of only 7 and 5 genes, respectively. Finally, quercetin treatment induced no change in the expression of all genes but exhibited higher cytotoxicty. These results suggest that among the transforming agents tested, some may share similar mechanisms of action leading to cell transformation while others may activate different additional pathways involved in such cellular process. More transforming and non-transforming agents and gene markers should be tested in order to try to identify a relevant gene signature to predict the transforming potential of non-genotoxic agents.