Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2025
Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness
Published on: March 18, 2022
A reproducibility study of knee cartilage volume and thickness values derived by fully automatic segmentation based
Ranxu Zhang1, Xiaoyue Zhou2, Esther Raithel3
1Department of CT/MR, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Province Biomechanical Key Laboratory of Orthopedics, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
Objective:
To evaluate the repeatability of cartilage volume and thickness values at 1.5 T MRI using a fully automatic cartilage segmentation method and reproducibility of the method between 1.5 T and 3 T data.
Methods:
The study included 20 knee joints from 10 healthy subjects with each subject having undergone double-knee MRI. All knees were scanned at 1.5 T and 3 T MR scanners using a three-dimensional (3D) high-resolution dual-echo in steady state (DESS) sequence. Cartilage volume and thickness of 21 subregions were quantified using a fully automatic cartilage segmentation research application (MR Chondral Health, version 3.0, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The volume and thickness values derived from fully automatically computed segmentation masks were analyzed for the scan-rescan data from the same volunteers. The accuracy of the automatic segmentation of the cartilage in 1.5 T images was evaluated by the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) using the manually corrected segmentation as a reference. The volume and thickness values calculated from 1.5 T and 3 T were also compared.
Results:
No statistically significant differences were found for cartilage thickness or volume across all subregions between the scan-rescanned data at 1.5 T (P > 0.05). The mean DSC between the fully automatic and manually corrected knee cartilage segmentation contours at 1.5 T was 0.9946. The average value of HD was 2.41 mm. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the cartilage volume or thickness in most-subregions between the two field strengths (P > 0.05) except for the medial region of femur and tibia. Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed high consistency between results obtained based on same and different scanning sequences.
Conclusion:
The cartilage segmentation software had high repeatability for DESS images obtained from the same device. In addition, the overall reproducibility of the images obtained from equipment of two different field strengths was satisfactory.
