Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Clinical outcome prediction using observational supervision with electronic health records and audit logs
Nandita Bhaskhar1, Wui Ip2, Jonathan H Chen3
1Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Objective:
Audit logs in electronic health record (EHR) systems capture interactions of providers with clinical data. We determine if machine learning (ML) models trained using audit logs in conjunction with clinical data ("observational supervision") outperform ML models trained using clinical data alone in clinical outcome prediction tasks, and whether they are more robust to temporal distribution shifts in the data.
Materials And Methods:
Using clinical and audit log data from Stanford Healthcare, we trained and evaluated various ML models including logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM) classifiers, neural networks, random forests, and gradient boosted machines (GBMs) on clinical EHR data, with and without audit logs for two clinical outcome prediction tasks: major adverse kidney events within 120 days of ICU admission (MAKE-120) in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients and 30-day readmission in acute stroke patients. We further tested the best performing models using patient data acquired during different time-intervals to evaluate the impact of temporal distribution shifts on model performance.
Results:
Performance generally improved for all models when trained with clinical EHR data and audit log data compared with those trained with only clinical EHR data, with GBMs tending to have the overall best performance. GBMs trained with clinical EHR data and audit logs outperformed GBMs trained without audit logs in both clinical outcome prediction tasks: AUROC 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91) vs. 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.81), respectively, for MAKE-120 prediction in AKI patients, and AUROC 0.74 (95% CI: 0.71-0.77) vs. 0.63 (95% CI: 0.62-0.64), respectively, for 30-day readmission prediction in acute stroke patients. The performance of GBM models trained using audit log and clinical data degraded less in later time-intervals than models trained using only clinical data.
Conclusion:
Observational supervision with audit logs improved the performance of ML models trained to predict important clinical outcomes in patients with AKI and acute stroke, and improved robustness to temporal distribution shifts.
More Related Videos
11:21Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nursing Evaluation
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Introduction to Epidemiology