The use of NexoBrid™ enzymatic debridement and coagulation abnormalities

Current evidence on how the use of bromelain-based enzymatic debridement techniques (NexoBrid™) affect patient coagulation is limited. A single patient case report [1] suggests that a patient with 15% total body surface area (TBSA) burn developed decreased coagulation activity following debridement with NexoBrid™ enzymatic debridement (ED). Regional Burns Centres in the United Kingdom may be reluctant to use ED, particularly in larger burns, citing concerns regarding coagulation. At our centre we have routinely used ED on deep partial thickness burns since 2017 including on patients with burns over 15% TBSA. This study aims to investigate whether there is a significant disruption in coagulation in patients undergoing ED with burns > 15% TBSA or admitted to intensive care compared to the standard of care (SOC) which is surgical debridement in theatre.

This single-centre retrospective study includes all patients with a burn treated with ED at Pinderfields General Hospital Regional Burns Centre intensive care unit (ITU) from 2017 to 2020. Patients were matched to those treated with SOC at the same centre by age, % TBSA burn and presence of inhalational injury. These parameters correlate with the Baux score [9]. Percentage of burn debrided was matched as closely as possible, with coagulation profiles and platelet count taken the day before, the day of and three days following surgery.

Thirty-one patients were treated with ED in the intensive care unit between 2017 and 2020. Four patients were excluded due to insufficient records and one patient was anti-coagulated. Twenty-six patients were included and matched as described above. Average age of patients receiving ED was 44 years, the same in the matched group. Average TBSA burn is 35.5% (35.8% in matched group). No statistically significant difference in coagulation was seen between patients undergoing ED compared to SOC when considering prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and platelet count. Both groups slightly breached the upper limit of normal on day 2 post ED and SOC. There was a slight breach of the lower limit of the average platelet count on day 2 post-ED which was neither statistically nor clinically significant.

Large burns are associated with coagulation abnormalities, therefore isolating a single variable in this cohort is challenging. However, this study found no significant change following ED use when compared to SOC and therefore no convincing evidence that ED is associated with coagulation abnormalities. This study represents one of the largest focusing on coagulation abnormalities following the use of ED, as the current literature is limited. Our study suggests that concerns regarding coagulation abnormalities should not prevent patients with large, deep partial thickness burns or full thickness burns being treated with ED.