Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy With Modified Blumgart Pancreaticojejunostomy
Published on: June 17, 2018
Nine de Graaf1,2,3, Anouk M L H Emmen4,5,6, Marco Ramera4
1Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy. n.degraaf@amsterdamUMC.nl.
Background:
Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and the potential shorter time to functional recovery needs to be confirmed. To guide safe implementation of MIPD, large-scale international randomized trials comparing MIPD and OPD in experienced high-volume centers are needed. We hypothesize that MIPD is non-inferior in terms of overall complications, but superior regarding time to functional recovery, as compared to OPD.
Methods/Design:
The DIPLOMA-2 trial is an international randomized controlled, patient-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 14 high-volume pancreatic centers in Europe with a minimum annual volume of 30 MIPD and 30 OPD. A total of 288 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for pre-malignant and malignant disease, eligible for both open and minimally invasive approach, are randomly allocated for MIPD or OPD in a 2:1 ratio. Centers perform either laparoscopic or robot-assisted MIPD based on their surgical expertise. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), measuring all complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 2.5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected difference of the mean CCI® score of 0 points between MIPD and OPD, and a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 points. The main secondary outcome is time to functional recovery, which will be analyzed for superiority. Other secondary outcomes include post-operative 90-day Fitbit™ measured activity, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery, surgeon-reported outcomes), oncological findings in case of malignancy (e.g., R0-resection rate, time to adjuvant treatment, survival), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications), healthcare resource utilization (length of stay, readmissions, intensive care stay), quality of life, and costs. Postoperative follow-up is up to 36 months.
Discussion:
The DIPLOMA-2 trial aims to establish the safety of MIPD as the new standard of care for this selected patient population undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in high-volume centers, ultimately aiming for superior patient recovery.
Trial Registration:
ISRCTN27483786. Registered on August 2, 2023.
Insights
Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) shows comparable safety to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) in high-volume centers. This approach also offers a faster time to functional recovery for patients undergoing this major surgery.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Gastrointestinal Surgery
Background:
- Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) is emerging as an alternative to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD).
- Debate continues regarding the safety and recovery benefits of MIPD.
- Large-scale international trials are needed to establish MIPD's role in clinical practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and functional recovery of MIPD versus OPD.
- To determine if MIPD is non-inferior to OPD in terms of overall complications.
- To assess if MIPD offers superior time to functional recovery compared to OPD.
Main Methods:
- The DIPLOMA-2 trial is a randomized, patient-blinded, non-inferiority trial conducted in 14 European high-volume pancreatic centers.
- 288 patients eligible for elective pancreatoduodenectomy were randomized 2:1 to MIPD or OPD.
- The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®) up to 90 days; secondary outcomes include time to functional recovery and oncological parameters.
Main Results:
- The DIPLOMA-2 trial is currently enrolling patients and has not yet reported primary or secondary outcomes.
- Data collection for complications (CCI®) and functional recovery is ongoing.
- The study is powered to detect non-inferiority in complications and superiority in recovery time.
Conclusions:
- The DIPLOMA-2 trial aims to establish MIPD as a safe standard of care in high-volume centers.
- The study seeks to confirm superior patient recovery with MIPD.
- Findings will guide the implementation of MIPD for selected pancreatoduodenectomy patients.

