Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

08:51
Data Acquisition and Analysis In Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry In Mice
Published on: May 10, 2019
11.7K
Preserved Auditory Steady State Response and Envelope-Following Response in Severe Brainstem Dysfunction Highlight
Macarena Díaz1, Federico Lucchetti2, Paul Avan3
1Bio-, Electro- and Mechanical Systems Department, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Ear and Hearing
|October 13, 2023
Summary
Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) testing may miss severe pediatric brainstem dysfunction. Envelope-Following Response (EFR) and Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) testing are more sensitive for diagnosing these auditory pathway issues.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Audiology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Auditory Steady State Response (ASSR) systems are standard for objective pediatric hearing threshold assessment.
- ASSRs in sleeping children are typically of subcortical origin, with the inferior colliculus as a major contributor.
- Severe brainstem dysfunction can impact auditory pathway responses, necessitating sensitive diagnostic tools.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the sensitivity of ASSR, Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR), and Envelope-Following Response (EFR) in diagnosing severe pediatric brainstem dysfunction.
- To differentiate peripheral (cochlear nerve) from central (brainstem) auditory pathway function using EFRs in sleeping children.
- To compare the diagnostic utility of different objective auditory electrophysiological tests in cases of brainstem dysfunction.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a neurophysiological assessment on 3 sleeping children with severe brainstem dysfunction.
- Utilized standard audiological tests including tympanometry, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, click-evoked ABRs, and ASSRs.
- Recorded EFRs using horizontal (EFR-H) and vertical (EFR-V) channels with a stimulus phase rotation technique to isolate and measure latency and phase-locking.
Main Results:
- Children with brainstem dysfunction showed abnormal ABR central waves but normal cochlear nerve function (ABR wave I, summating potential, cochlear microphonic potential).
- EFR-H recordings indicated normal cochlear nerve function, while EFR-V showed abnormal latencies and phase-locking, suggesting central auditory pathway involvement.
- ASSR audiograms in two cases provided normal or slightly elevated thresholds, failing to detect the underlying brainstem dysfunction, unlike ABR and EFR.
Conclusions:
- ASSR testing lacks sensitivity for severe pediatric brainstem dysfunction, potentially leading to missed diagnoses.
- EFR recordings, particularly EFR-V, demonstrate greater sensitivity in detecting central auditory pathway abnormalities compared to ASSR.
- The Cross-Check Principle, incorporating ABR and EFR alongside or instead of ASSR, is crucial for comprehensive auditory assessment in pediatric cases with suspected brainstem dysfunction.
Related Concept Videos
Effects of EDTA on End-Point Detection Methods
Different methods, such as visual observance of metal-ion indicators, spectroscopic techniques, and potentiometric methods, can determine the endpoint of an EDTA titration.
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a result, EDTA...
In the visual method, metal-ion indicators (metallochromic dyes), which have distinct colors in their free and complex forms, are added to the mixture to signal the titration's end point. They form stable complexes with metal ions, but these complexes are weaker than the corresponding metal–EDTA complexes. As a result, EDTA...
Interference and Decay
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

