Optimizing Exosome Preparation Based on Size and Morphology: Insights From Electron Microscopy

Noriyuki Ishii1,2,3, Keiichi Noguchi4, Mitsushi J Ikemoto5,6

  • 1Cellular and Molecular Biotechnology Research Institute, Department of Life Science and Biotechnology, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central-6, 1-1-1 Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan.

Insights

Optimizing extracellular vesicle (EV) isolation, this study found a salt-free buffer preserves EV integrity and reveals distinct size populations. This improves exosome characterization for biomedical applications.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology
  • Nanotechnology

Background:

  • Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, are key mediators of intercellular communication.
  • Distinguishing exosomes from other EVs like microvesicles is difficult due to overlapping size and morphology.
  • Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) are critical sites for exosome biogenesis and maturation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To optimize exosome isolation and characterization methods.
  • To investigate the impact of buffer composition on EV integrity and size distribution.
  • To identify distinct EV populations relevant to exosome biogenesis within MVBs.

Main Methods:

  • Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) for high-resolution size and morphology analysis.
  • Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) for nanoparticle size distribution assessment.
  • Immunoelectron microscopy to validate exosome biomarker presence (CD63).
  • Comparative buffer analysis using salt-free Bis-Tris versus phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and high-salt Bis-Tris.

Main Results:

  • Salt-free Bis-Tris buffer better maintains the integrity of extracellular vesicles (EVs) compared to PBS.
  • Intact exosome fractions in salt-free Bis-Tris show polydispersity, including a <50 nm population resembling intraluminal vesicles (ILVs).
  • This <50 nm population is lost in PBS or high-salt Bis-Tris, with EVs aggregating into larger, monodisperse populations (>100 nm).
  • CD63, an exosome marker, was confirmed on approximately 50 nm EVs via immunoelectron microscopy.

Conclusions:

  • A salt-free buffer is crucial for preserving the native size distribution and integrity of exosomes.
  • The study identifies a distinct population of small EVs (<50 nm) originating from MVBs, critical for accurate exosome characterization.
  • These optimized isolation and characterization methods are vital for advancing exosome-based diagnostics and drug delivery systems.

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
Overview of Electron Microscopy01:25

Overview of Electron Microscopy

The wavelengths of visible light ultimately limit the maximum theoretical resolution of images created by light microscopes. Most light microscopes can only magnify 1000X, and a few can magnify up to 1500X. Electrons, like electromagnetic radiation, can behave like waves, but with wavelengths of 0.005 nm, they produce significantly greater resolution up to 0.05 nm as compared to 500 nm for visible light. An electron microscope (EM) can create a sharp image that is magnified up to 2,000,000X.
Transmission Electron Microscopy01:15

Transmission Electron Microscopy

In 1931, physicist Ernst Ruska—building on the idea that magnetic fields can direct an electron beam just as lenses can direct a beam of light in an optical microscope—developed the first prototype of the electron microscope. This development led to the development of the field of electron microscopy. In the transmission electron microscope (TEM), electrons are produced by a hot tungsten element and accelerated by a potential difference in an electron gun, which gives them up to 400 keV in...
Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy01:20

Preparation of Samples for Electron Microscopy

To be visualized by an electron microscope, either transmission or scanning, biological samples need to be fixed (stabilized) so the electron beam does not destroy them and dried thoroughly (desiccated/dehydrated) so the vacuum does not affect them. Fixation needs to be done as quickly as possible because the sample properties will start changing as soon as it is removed from its natural environment. For example, in a tissue sample, the oxygen levels begin decreasing, causing an altered...
Overview of Microscopy Techniques01:22

Overview of Microscopy Techniques

The early pioneers of microscopy opened a window into the invisible world of microorganisms. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes that leveraged nonvisible light, such as fluorescence microscopy that uses an ultraviolet light source and electron microscopy that uses short-wavelength electron beams. These advances significantly improved magnification, image resolution, and contrast. By comparison, the...
Two-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology01:29

Two-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

Two-dimensional (2D) microscopy encompasses a range of optical techniques that capture images within a single focal plane, offering detailed representations of microscopic structures. These techniques are essential in biological and medical research, enabling the visualization of cellular and subcellular structures with different levels of contrast and specificity.There are several major types of 2D microscopy, each with strengths and applications.Bright-Field MicroscopyBright-field microscopy...