Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Pay-for-Performance incentives for specialised services in England: a mixed methods evaluation.
Yan Feng1, Søren Rud Kristensen2,3, Paula Lorgelly4,5
1Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Queen Mary University of London, Yvonne Carter Building, 58 Turner Street, Whitechapel, London, E1 2AB, UK. yan.feng@qmul.ac.uk.
The Prescribed Specialised Services Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (PSS CQUIN) programme showed limited success in improving specialised healthcare services. Lessons learned from this Pay-for-Performance initiative can inform future healthcare incentive designs.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare management
- Health services research
- Quality improvement initiatives
Background:
- The English NHS introduced the Prescribed Specialised Services Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (PSS CQUIN) in 2013/2014 for rare and complex conditions.
- This study evaluates PSS CQUIN contract implementation from 2016/2017 to 2018/2019.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of PSS CQUIN schemes on targeted outcomes.
- To explore the complexities of contract design and programme implementation in specialised healthcare services.
Main Methods:
- A mixed-methods approach combining quantitative (difference-in-differences with propensity score matching) and qualitative (semi-structured interviews, focus groups) analyses.
- Quantitative analysis assessed impacts on targeted outcomes and costs.
- Qualitative analysis explored implementation challenges using constant comparative method.
Main Results:
- PSS CQUIN schemes demonstrated limited impact on targeted outcomes, with only one scheme showing a statistically significant improvement (7% increase in timely discharge from Adult Critical Care in trauma).
- Potential reasons for limited impact include small incentive payments, complex scheme design, and issues with ownership, contracting, and flexibility.
- No significant impact on overall quality improvements in specialised services was observed.
Conclusions:
- PSS CQUIN schemes had minimal to no effect on enhancing quality in specialised healthcare services.
- Future Pay-for-Performance programmes should consider the study's findings on incentive design and implementation strategies for greater effectiveness.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Secondary Healthcare System
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Nursing Evaluation