Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Differences between electroretinograms of cat and primate.

R F Hess, C L Baker, E Zrenner

    Journal of Neurophysiology
    |September 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Solid-State Nanopores for Spatially Resolved Chemical Neuromodulation.

    Nano letters·2024
    Same author

    Improvements for recording retinal function with Microelectrode Arrays.

    MethodsX·2024
    Same author

    Classification of pseudocalcium visual responses from mouse retinal ganglion cells.

    Visual neuroscience·2022
    Same author

    Classification of pseudocalcium visual responses from mouse retinal ganglion cells-CORRIGENDUM.

    Visual neuroscience·2022
    Same author

    A case of X-linked retinoschisis with atypical fundus appearance.

    Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2019
    Same author

    Retinal dystrophies with bull's-eye maculopathy along with negative ERGs.

    Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2019

    The pattern electroretinogram (ERG) differs between cats and primates, suggesting distinct neural generators. This finding is crucial for using animal models to study human visual pathways and the pattern ERG.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Ophthalmology
    • Visual Electrophysiology

    Background:

    • The electroretinogram (ERG) is a key diagnostic tool in ophthalmology.
    • Understanding the generators of pattern ERG is vital for interpreting visual function.
    • Animal models are often used to study human visual pathways.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the electroretinogram (ERG) evoked by pattern and uniform field stimulation in cats, monkeys, and humans.
    • To investigate differences in pattern ERG characteristics between species.
    • To elucidate the generators of the pattern ERG and their implications for animal modeling.

    Main Methods:

    • Steady-state analysis of electroretinogram (ERG) responses.
    • Utilized pattern and uniform field stimulation.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared responses across cat, monkey, and human subjects.

    • Main Results:

    • Pattern-evoked ERG in primates shows resonance at 8 Hz, spatial band-pass characteristics, contrast linearity, and lacks a scotopic component.
    • These pattern ERG properties are absent in cats.
    • The second harmonic component of uniform field ERG in primates shares characteristics with the pattern ERG, suggesting a common generator.

    Conclusions:

    • The pattern ERG generator in primates differs from that in cats.
    • The findings suggest a distinct generator for the pattern ERG and the second harmonic component of the uniform field ERG in primates.
    • Caution is advised when using cat models for the human pattern ERG due to species-specific differences in visual pathway generators.