Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K
Schemas01:42

Schemas

11.6K
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
11.6K
Fixed Action Patterns01:06

Fixed Action Patterns

16.0K
A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.
16.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cortico-subthalamic circuit rapidly engages and releases inhibition of specific movements depending on the environmental context.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Cortico-basal ganglia dynamics of global and selective response inhibition in humans.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Exploring neural mechanisms underlying error-related impairments in active working memory suggests an adaptive shielding of contents during cognitive control.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Common and Unique Neurophysiological Processes That Support the Stopping and Revising of Actions.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Lexical inhibition after semantic violations recruits a domain-general inhibitory control mechanism.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2024
Same author

Biophysical Modeling of Frontocentral ERP Generation Links Circuit-Level Mechanisms of Action-Stopping to a Behavioral Race Model.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K

Early Action Error Processing Is Due to Domain-General Surprise, Whereas Later Processing Is Error Specific.

Yoojeong Choo1,2, Alec Mather1, Jan R Wessel3,4,2

  • 1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242.

The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience
|October 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Behavioral adaptation after errors involves post-error slowing (PES). This study found that while both errors and surprise initially slow responses, only errors trigger unique neural processes for adaptation with more processing time.

Keywords:
EEG decodingMVPAcognitive controlerror processingpost-error slowingsurprise

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

5.4K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.0K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

15.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Background:

  • Cognitive control enables behavioral adaptation after errors, often observed as post-error slowing (PES).
  • Recent theories question if PES reflects adaptive control or is merely a byproduct of error-related surprise.
  • Neuroimaging suggests overlapping brain networks for error and surprise processing, challenging the existence of a dedicated error system.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if unique, error-specific processes contribute to PES beyond domain-general surprise.
  • To differentiate neural mechanisms underlying error processing versus general surprise.
  • To determine if behavioral adaptation after errors is a distinct cognitive function.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized electroencephalography (EEG) decoding and a novel behavioral paradigm.
  • Conducted two experiments with 76 human participants (male and female).
  • Analyzed behavioral responses and neural activity across different response-stimulus intervals.

Main Results:

  • Both errors and error-unrelated surprise led to slower responses at short intervals.
  • Early neural processes for errors and surprise showed cross-decoding, indicating shared mechanisms.
  • At longer intervals, only errors elicited sustained slowing and distinct neural activity, suggesting error-specific adaptation.

Conclusions:

  • Initial processing of errors and surprise involves common neural mechanisms.
  • With additional processing time, unique, error-specific processes emerge, contributing to adaptive behavioral control.
  • These findings support a distinct role for error processing in cognitive adaptation beyond general surprise detection.