Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

05:12
Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach for Thyroid Lobectomy
Published on: May 12, 2023
3.7K
Comparative analysis between ultrasonic shears versus advanced bipolar device in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy:
Shin-Young Park1, Myung Ho Shin1, Young Mi Hwang1
1Department of Surgery, Inha University Hospital & College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Gland Surgery
|October 16, 2023
Summary
The advanced bipolar device is superior for transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) surgery, reducing operation time and blood loss compared to ultrasonic shears. This minimally invasive technique offers better performance for endocrine surgeons.
Area of Science:
- Endocrine Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Technology
Background:
- Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA) is a novel, scarless minimally invasive thyroidectomy technique.
- Effective energy devices are crucial for dissection and hemostasis in endoscopic thyroid surgery.
- No prior clinical studies have compared ultrasonic shears and advanced bipolar devices specifically for TOETVA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the comparative efficacy of ultrasonic shears versus an advanced bipolar device in TOETVA.
- To evaluate which energy device offers better performance in terms of operative efficiency and safety during TOETVA.
Main Methods:
- An open-label, prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted with 40 patients undergoing TOETVA.
- Patients were randomized into two groups: ultrasonic shears (n=20) or advanced bipolar device (n=20).
- Primary outcomes included lobectomy time, camera cleaning frequency, and blood loss; secondary outcomes assessed pain, drainage, and blood chemistry.
Main Results:
- The advanced bipolar group demonstrated a significantly shorter lobectomy operation time (33.8 vs. 41.9 minutes, P=0.002).
- Fewer camera cleanings were required in the advanced bipolar group (2.9 vs. 5.8 times, P<0.001).
- Estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the advanced bipolar group (11.5 vs. 81.8 mL, P=0.004), with no significant differences in other outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The advanced bipolar device exhibited superior performance in TOETVA, evidenced by reduced operation time, fewer camera cleanings, and less blood loss.
- The findings suggest the advanced bipolar device is a preferable energy source for performing TOETVA.
- Further research may explore long-term outcomes and broader applications of this device in endoscopic thyroid surgery.

