Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Exercise after Breast Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2021
Same author

Geochemical background indicators within a tropical estuarine system influenced by a port-industrial complex.

Marine pollution bulletin·2020
Same author

Prospective Controlled Study of Chin Augmentation by Means of Fat Grafting.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2017
Same author

Evolutionary Reasons for Male Preferences Regarding the Female Breast Shape.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2015
Same author

Diagnosis and management of galactorrhea after breast augmentation.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2015
Same author

Comments on "breast striae after cosmetic augmentation".

Aesthetic surgery journal·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

6.7K

Using Machine Learning to Select Breast Implant Volume.

Filipe V Basile1, Thais S Oliveira1

  • 1From private practice.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|October 16, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning accurately predicts breast implant size for augmentation surgery. This AI tool aids surgeons and patients, improving outcomes and satisfaction by reducing suboptimal implant selections.

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

6.7K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Breast augmentation surgery relies on subjective implant size selection, often leading to patient dissatisfaction.
  • Accurate breast implant sizing is critical for successful surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a machine-learning (ML) model for predicting optimal breast implant size in augmentation procedures.
  • To enhance decision-making in breast augmentation by providing objective, data-driven implant size recommendations.

Main Methods:

  • A supervised ML model was trained using data from 1000 breast augmentation patients.
  • Data included patient demographics, medical history, and surgeon preferences to predict implant size.

Main Results:

  • The ML model achieved a high accuracy in predicting breast implant size, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9335 (P < 0.001).
  • Predictions were accurate in 86% of cases, with a mean absolute error of 27.10 mL.
  • In a reoperation cohort, 63% of patients could have benefited from a more suitable implant size suggested by the model, potentially avoiding revision surgery.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning offers a reliable method for accurately predicting breast implant size in augmentation surgery.
  • Integrating this AI model into decision support systems can guide surgeons and patients, streamlining selection and improving satisfaction.
  • This data-driven approach enhances communication and decision-making, leading to better surgical results and increased patient contentment.