Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

In utero Measurement of Heart Rate in Mouse by Noninvasive M-mode Echocardiography
Published on: November 22, 2013
New-onset heart failure in infants: when the aetiological diagnosis becomes a challenge
Roger Esmel-Vilomara1,2,3, Lucía Riaza4,5, Paola Dolader6,4
1Paediatric Cardiology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain. roger.esmel@gmail.com.
Insights
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) show inflammation in infants with heart failure, but differentiating causes remains challenging. A comprehensive approach including EMB, CMR, and genetic testing is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Inflammatory Cardiomyopathies
Background:
- Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard for myocarditis but lacks universal acceptance.
- The diagnostic utility of the 2018 Lake Louise Criteria (LLC) in pediatric patients requires further definition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with quantitative mappings in infants with new-onset heart failure.
- To assess the capabilities of EMB and CMR in detecting inflammatory cardiomyopathies and determining their etiology.
Main Methods:
- Prospective analysis of infants undergoing CMR with tissue mappings, EMB, and genetic testing.
- Categorization into groups based on inflammatory cardiomyopathy with negative genetics (suspected myocarditis) versus positive genetics (suspected dilated cardiomyopathy).
- Clinical presentation, echocardiography, troponin, NT-proBNP, EMB findings (mononuclear cells, T-lymphocytes), and CMR (including late gadolinium enhancement and tissue mappings) were analyzed.
Main Results:
- All patients met EMB criteria for inflammatory cardiomyopathy; significant differences in inflammation and edema were found between groups.
- Higher troponin levels correlated with increased inflammation.
- Neither classic CMR criteria nor 2018 Lake Louise Criteria differentiated the groups; only late gadolinium enhancement showed association with myocarditis, while other CMR parameters and tissue mappings did not.
- No correlation was observed between EMB-detected inflammation and CMR findings.
Conclusions:
- Infant heart dysfunction can stem from inherited factors or infections, often involving inflammation.
- While CMR is sensitive to inflammation, it may not differentiate between myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy in infants.
- A comprehensive diagnostic strategy is essential, integrating EMB (T-lymphocytes, edema), CMR (LGE, tissue mappings), viral detection, troponin levels, and genetic testing.
Abstract:
This study aimed to report the findings of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) with quantitative mappings in infants presenting with new-onset heart failure, as well as to assess the capabilities of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and CMR in detecting inflammatory cardiomyopathies and determining their etiology. In a prospective analysis of infants who underwent CMR with tissue mappings, EMB, and genetic testing, the sample was categorized into two groups: those with inflammatory cardiomyopathy and negative genetics (indicative of possible myocarditis) and those with positive genetics (indicative of possible dilated cardiomyopathy). All patients exhibited similar clinical presentations, echocardiographic dysfunction, and elevated troponins and NT-proBNP levels. Additionally, they all met the diagnostic criteria for inflammatory cardiomyopathy based on EMB findings (≥14 mononuclear cells, ≥7 T-lymphocytes/mm2). EMB results unveiled significant differences in the presence of inflammation and edema between the two groups, with higher troponin levels correlating with increased inflammation. Notably, when focusing on CMR, neither the classic criteria nor the 2018 Lake Louise criteria (LLC) could effectively differentiate between the two groups. Only late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) appeared to be associated with myocarditis in this cohort, while other LLC and tissue mappings did not exhibit a similar correlation. Importantly, there was no observed correlation between the inflammation detected through EMB and CMR.
Conclusions:
The onset of heart dysfunction in infants can result from either inherited factors or viral infections, both of which may involve inflammation. However, the precise role of EMB and CMR in determining the etiology of such cases remains poorly defined. While CMR demonstrates high sensitivity in detecting inflammation, our experience suggests that it may not effectively differentiate between these two groups. A comprehensive diagnostic approach is essential when addressing this challenge, which includes considering EMB (with attention to the number of T-lymphocytes and the presence of oedema), specific CMR criteria, notably LGE and tissue mappings, as well as the identification of viral agents in cardiac tissue and troponin levels. Additionally, genetic tests should be conducted when evaluating these patients.
What Is Known:
• EMB is the gold standard diagnostic test for myocarditis but it is not universally accepted. • The diagnostic value of the 2018-LLC in pediatric patients is still undefined.
What Is New:
• Both EMB and CMR may show inflammation in infants with new-onset heart failure of any aetiology. • A global approach should be used when facing this diagnostic challenge, including the EMB (number of T-lymphocytes and oedema), some CMR criteria, specially LGE and mappings, the detection of viral agents in cardiac tissue and troponins. Genetic tests should also be performed when studying these patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

