ABCs of hemodiafiltration prescription: The Pisa style
Emanuela Mangione1,2, Domenico Giannese1,2, Adamasco Cupisti3,4
1Nephrology, Transplants and Dialysis Unit, AOUP, Via Paradisa 2, 50625, Pisa, Italy.
Abstract:
In end-stage kidney disease patients, hemodiafiltration, a mixed diffusive-convective technique, has shown beneficial effects in terms of improvement of anemia, inflammation, mineral bone disorders, malnutrition and cardiovascular stability. Greater convective volume exchange was also associated with improved overall and cardiovascular survival. However, absolute target threshold volume would be difficult to define and achieve in daily clinical practice, mainly because of differences in patient size. Convective volumes standardized for body surface area would appear to be the simplest approach in clinical practice. Several factors can affect achievement of optimal convective volume, with vascular access being the main limiting factor. Based on our own clinical experience, hemodiafiltration is a more effective and preferable dialysis technique but only when a target convective volume greater than 20 L can be achieved. Conversely, standard high flux hemodialysis or expanded hemodialysis may be helpful and valuable alternative dialysis techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Peritoneal Dialysis I: Introduction and Procedure
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Peritoneal Dialysis III: Nursing Management


