Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 22, 2026

Modified Laparoscopic Anatomic Hepatectomy: Two-Surgeon Technique Combined with the Simple Extracorporeal Pringle Maneuver
Published on: June 16, 2023
Circumstances and implications of conversion from minimally invasive to open liver resection: a multi-center analysis
Hallbera Gudmundsdottir1, Guido Fiorentini1, Yasmin Essaji2
1Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Background:
Minimally invasive approaches to liver resection (MILR) are associated with favorable outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the implications of conversion to an open procedure on perioperative outcomes.
Methods:
Patients who underwent MILR at 10 North American institutions were identified from the Americas Minimally Invasive Liver Resection (AMILES) database. Outcomes of patients who required conversion were compared to those who did not. Additionally, outcomes after conversion due to unfavorable findings (poor visualization/access, lack of progress, disease extent) versus intraoperative events (bleeding, injury, cardiopulmonary instability) were compared.
Results:
Of 1675 patients who underwent MILR, 102 (6.1%) required conversion. Conversion rate ranged from 4.4% for left lateral sectionectomy to 10% for right hepatectomy. The primary reason for conversion was unfavorable findings in 67 patients (66%) and intraoperative adverse events in 35 patients (34%). By multivariable analysis, major resection, cirrhosis, prior liver surgery, and tumor proximity to major vessels were identified as risk factors for conversion (p < 0.05). Patients who required conversion had higher blood loss, transfusion requirements, operative time, and length of stay, (p < 0.05). They also had higher major complication rates (23% vs. 5.2%, p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (8.8% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001). When compared to those who required conversion due to unfavorable findings, patients who required conversion due to intraoperative adverse events had significantly higher major complication rates (43% vs. 14%, p = 0.012) and 30-day mortality (20% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.007).
Conclusions:
Conversion from MILR to open surgery is associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. Conversion due to intraoperative adverse events is rare but associated with significantly higher complication and mortality rates, while conversion due to unfavorable findings is associated with similar outcomes as planned open resection. High-risk patients may benefit from early conversion in a controlled fashion if difficulties are encountered or anticipated.
Insights
Conversion from minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) to open surgery increases complications and mortality. While conversion due to adverse events is rare and severe, conversion for unfavorable findings yields similar outcomes to planned open procedures.
Area of Science:
- Hepatobiliary surgery
- Surgical oncology
- Minimally invasive surgery
Background:
- Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) offers favorable outcomes.
- Conversion to open surgery during MILR can impact patient outcomes.
- Understanding the implications of conversion is crucial for surgical planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the perioperative outcomes associated with conversion from MILR to open surgery.
- To compare outcomes based on the reason for conversion: unfavorable findings versus intraoperative adverse events.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the Americas Minimally Invasive Liver Resection (AMILES) database.
- Comparison of outcomes between patients who required conversion and those who did not.
- Stratification of conversion outcomes based on the cause (unfavorable findings vs. adverse events).
Main Results:
- Conversion occurred in 6.1% of MILR cases.
- Conversion was associated with higher blood loss, transfusion rates, operative time, length of stay, major complications, and 30-day mortality.
- Conversion due to intraoperative adverse events led to significantly higher complication and mortality rates compared to conversion for unfavorable findings.
Conclusions:
- Conversion from MILR to open surgery is linked to increased perioperative morbidity and mortality.
- Conversion due to intraoperative adverse events, though rare, carries the highest risk.
- Conversion for unfavorable findings has outcomes similar to planned open resections; early conversion may benefit high-risk patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mass Analyzers: Overview
Mass Analyzers: Common Types

