Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Human Brain Modulation – Optimized Protocols for Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation Experiments
Published on: June 28, 2024
An efficient method for transcranial ultrasound focus correction based on the coupling of boundary integrals and
Fei Shen1, Fan Fan1, Fengji Li1
1School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Abstract:
Transcranial focused ultrasound is a novel technique for the noninvasive treatment of brain diseases. The success of the treatment greatly depends on achieving precise and efficient intraoperative focus. However, compensating for aberrated ultrasound waves caused by the skull through numerical simulation-based phase corrections is a challenging task due to the significant computational burden involved in solving the acoustic wave equation. In this article, we propose a promising strategy using the coupling of the boundary integral equation method (BIEM) and the finite element method (FEM) to overcome the above limitation. Specifically, we adopt the BIEM to obtain the Robin-to-Dirichlet maps on the boundaries of the skull and then couple the maps to the FEM matrices via a dual interpolation technique, resulting in a computational domain including only the skull. Three simulation experiments were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method, including a convergence test and two skull-induced aberration corrections in 2D and 3D ultrasound. The results show that the method's convergence is guaranteed as the element size decreases, leading to a decrease in pressure error. The computation times for simulating a 500 kHz ultrasound field on a regular desktop computer were found to be 0.47 ± 0.01 s in the 2D case and 43.72 ± 1.49 s in the 3D case, provided that lower-upper decomposition (approximately 13 s in 2D and 2.5 h in 3D) was implemented in advance. We also demonstrated that more accurate transcranial focusing can be achieved by phase correction compared to the noncorrected results (with errors of 1.02 mm vs. 6.45 mm in 2D and 0.28 mm vs. 3.07 mm in 3D). The proposed strategy is valuable for enabling online ultrasound simulations during treatment, facilitating real-time adjustments and interventions.
More Related Videos
08:08Evaluating Targeting Accuracy in the Focal Plane for an Ultrasound-guided High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Phased-array System
Published on: March 6, 2019
08:37Focused Ultrasound Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening for Targeting Brain Structures and Evaluating Chemogenetic Neuromodulation
Published on: December 22, 2020