Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

116
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
116
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

52
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
52
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

137
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
137
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

133
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
133
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

191
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
191
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

439
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
439

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decorated gold nanoparticles on baicalein/chitosan-modified zinc oxide nanoparticles for one-pot preparation of pyrano[2,3-d]pyrimidines and inhibiting the gastrointestinal stromal tumor progression by controlling the gene expression of the cell cycle.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2025
Same author

Unlocking the relationships between role stressors and unsafe behaviours of miners: the mediating role of risk perception.

International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE·2025
Same author

What occupational risk factors significantly affect miners' health: Findings from meta-analysis and association rule mining.

Journal of safety research·2024
Same author

Identification of critical causes of construction accidents in China using a hybrid HFACS-CN model.

International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE·2024
Same author

Capturing and quantifying the aggregate effects of multi-source factors affecting miners' health and well-being: Construction of Bayesian belief networks.

Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress·2023
Same author

Cumulative risk assessment for combinations of environmental and psychosocial stressors: A systematic review.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

Risk coupling analysis under accident scenario evolution: A methodological construct and application.

Jianting Yao1,2, Boling Zhang1, Dongdong Wang1

  • 1School of Emergency Management and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing, China.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|October 18, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new framework for analyzing coupled risks in dynamic scenarios, focusing on digitization and objective quantification. It helps identify key risk factors and understand accident evolution to prevent cascading failures.

Keywords:
community firerisk couplingscenario evolution

More Related Videos

A Contusive Model of Unilateral Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Using the Infinite Horizon Impactor
07:28

A Contusive Model of Unilateral Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Using the Infinite Horizon Impactor

Published on: July 24, 2012

19.6K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K
A Contusive Model of Unilateral Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Using the Infinite Horizon Impactor
07:28

A Contusive Model of Unilateral Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Using the Infinite Horizon Impactor

Published on: July 24, 2012

19.6K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Risk analysis
  • Systems engineering
  • Data mining

Background:

  • Dynamic processes often involve interconnected risks, but current analysis methods overlook these coupling effects.
  • A need exists for a comprehensive approach to risk coupling that embraces digitization and objective quantification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose an integrated framework for analyzing risk coupling in dynamic scenarios.
  • To address the limitations of existing studies by incorporating full-process analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the weighted Eclat algorithm for mining risk association rules.
  • Employed social network analysis to identify key risk factors.
  • Applied stochastic Petri nets for constructing, simulating, and evolving accident scenarios.

Main Results:

  • Developed a universal framework for process-oriented analysis of accident scenario evolution.
  • Demonstrated the ability to decouple risks by focusing on key factors and breaking accident chains.
  • Validated the framework's feasibility and scientific validity through an application to fire risk in Chinese urban communities.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed framework offers a novel approach to understanding and managing coupled risks in complex dynamic systems.
  • Effective risk decoupling and accident chain interruption are achievable through process-oriented analysis and identification of critical factors.