Exploring Breast Cancer Systemic Drug Therapy Patterns in Real-World Data
Julia O'Rourke1, Jeff Warnick1, John Doole1
1TriNetX, LLC, Cambridge, MA.
Purpose:
To explore medications and their administration patterns in real-world patients with breast cancer.
Methods:
A retrospective study was performed using TriNetX, a federated network of deidentified, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant data from 21 health care organizations across North America. Patients diagnosed with breast cancer between January 1, 2013, and May 31, 2022, were included. We investigated a rule-based and unsupervised learning algorithm to extract medications and their administration patterns. To group similar administration patterns, we used three features in k-means clustering: total number of administrations, median number of days between administrations, and standard deviation of the days between administrations. We explored the first three lines of therapy for patients classified into six groups on the basis of their stage at diagnosis (early as stages I-III v late as stage IV) and the sensitivity of the tumor's receptors to targeted therapies: hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor 2-negative (HR+/ERBB2-), ERBB2-positive (ERBB2+/HR±), or triple-negative (TN; HR-/ERBB2-). To add credence to the derived regimens, we compared them to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN): Breast Cancer (version 2.2023) recommendations.
Results:
In early-stage HR+/ERBB2- and TN groups, the most common regimens were (1) cyclophosphamide and docetaxel, administered once every 3 weeks for three to six cycles and (2) cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, administered once every 2 weeks for four cycles, followed by paclitaxel administered once every week for 12 cycles. In the early-stage ERBB2+/HR± group, most patients were administered carboplatin and docetaxel with or without pertuzumab and with trastuzumab (for six or more cycles). Medications most commonly administered in our data set (7,798 patients) agreed with recommendations from the NCCN in terms of medications (regimens), number of administrations (cycles), and days between administrations (cycle length).
Conclusion:
Although there is a general agreement with the NCCN Guidelines, real-world medication data exhibit variability in the medications and their administration patterns.
Insights
Real-world breast cancer treatment shows common medication patterns aligning with NCCN guidelines, but with some variability in drug administration and cycles used in clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Health Informatics
Background:
- Breast cancer treatment involves complex medication regimens.
- Understanding real-world drug administration is crucial for optimizing patient care.
- Variability in treatment patterns can impact efficacy and patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze real-world medication use and administration patterns in breast cancer patients.
- To compare observed treatment regimens with established clinical guidelines.
- To identify common drug administration sequences and their variations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of deidentified patient data from the TriNetX network (2013-2022).
- Utilized rule-based and unsupervised learning (k-means clustering) to extract medication data and administration patterns.
- Classified patients by cancer stage (early vs. late) and receptor status (HR+/ERBB2-, ERBB2+, TN) for analysis.
- Compared derived regimens against National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.
Main Results:
- Common regimens identified for early-stage HR+/ERBB2- and TN breast cancer included cyclophosphamide/docetaxel and cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin followed by paclitaxel.
- For early-stage ERBB2+/HR± breast cancer, carboplatin/docetaxel with trastuzumab and potentially pertuzumab was frequent.
- Observed medication use, number of administrations, and cycle lengths generally aligned with NCCN recommendations across 7,798 patients.
Conclusions:
- Real-world breast cancer medication administration generally aligns with NCCN guidelines.
- Variability exists in specific drug choices and administration schedules in clinical practice.
- Further research can explore the impact of this variability on treatment outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Survival Analysis


