Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
Published on: August 20, 2019
Mobile element insertions in rare diseases: a comparative benchmark and reanalysis of 60,000 exome samples
Robin Wijngaard1,2, German Demidov3, Luke O'Gorman1
1Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
Mobile element insertions (MEIs) are a known cause of genetic disease but have been underexplored due to technical limitations of genetic testing methods. Various bioinformatic tools have been developed to identify MEIs in Next Generation Sequencing data. However, most tools have been developed specifically for genome sequencing (GS) data rather than exome sequencing (ES) data, which remains more widely used for routine diagnostic testing. In this study, we benchmarked six MEI detection tools (ERVcaller, MELT, Mobster, SCRAMble, TEMP2 and xTea) on ES data and on GS data from publicly available genomic samples (HG002, NA12878). For all the tools we evaluated sensitivity and precision of different filtering strategies. Results show that there were substantial differences in tool performance between ES and GS data. MELT performed best with ES data and its combination with SCRAMble increased substantially the detection rate of MEIs. By applying both tools to 10,890 ES samples from Solve-RD and 52,624 samples from Radboudumc we were able to diagnose 10 patients who had remained undiagnosed by conventional ES analysis until now. Our study shows that MELT and SCRAMble can be used reliably to identify clinically relevant MEIs in ES data. This may lead to an additional diagnosis for 1 in 3000 to 4000 patients in routine clinical ES.
Related Concept Videos
Non-LTR Retrotransposons
Genomics
Overview of Transposition and Recombination
Exon Recombination
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...

