Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Heterogeneous Removal of Water-Soluble Ruthenium Olefin Metathesis Catalyst from Aqueous Media Via Host-Guest Interaction
Published on: August 23, 2018
Aromatic interactions with heterocycles in water
Gloria Tobajas-Curiel1, Qingqing Sun2,3, Jeremy K M Sanders1
1Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge Cambridge CB2 1EW UK herchelsmith.orgchem@ch.cam.ac.uk.
Abstract:
Conformationally well-defined supramolecular complexes that can be studied in different solvents provide a platform for separating and quantifying free energy contributions due to functional group interactions and desolvation. Here 1:1 complexes formed between four different calix[4]pyrrole receptors and eleven different pyridine N-oxide guests have been used to dissect the factors that govern aromatic interactions with heterocycles in water and in chloroform solution. 1H NMR spectroscopy shows that the three-dimensional structures of the complexes are fixed by four H-bonding interactions between the pyrrole donors at the bottom of the receptor and the N-oxide acceptor on the guest, locking the geometrical arrangement of interacting functional groups in the binding pocket at the other end of the receptor. An aromatic heterocycle on the guest makes two stacking interactions and two edge-to-face interactions with the side walls of the receptor. Chemical double mutant cycles were used to measure the free energy contribution of these four aromatic interactions to the overall stability of the complex. In chloroform, the aromatic interactions measured with pyridine, pyrimidine, furan, thiophene and thiazole are similar to the interactions with a phenyl group, but the effect of introducing a heteroatom depends on where it sits with respect to the aromatic side-walls of the cavity. A nitrogen lone pair directed into a π-face of the side-walls of the binding site leads to repulsive interactions of up to 8 kJ mol-1. In water, the heterocycle aromatic interactions are all significantly more favourable (by up to 12 kJ mol-1). For the non-polar heterocycles, furan and thiophene, the increase in interaction energy correlates directly with hydrophobicity, as measured by the free energy of transfer of the heterocycle from n-hexadecane into water (ΔG°(water-hex)). For the heterocycles with polar nitrogen H-bond acceptors, water can access cracks in the walls of the receptor binding site to solvate the edges of the heterocycles without significantly affecting the geometry of the aromatic interactions, and these nitrogen-water H-bonds stabilise the complexes by about 15 kJ mol-1. The results highlight the complexity of the solvation processes that govern molecular recognition in water.
More Related Videos
05:34Efficient Synthesis of Polyfunctionalized Benzenes in Water via Persulfate-promoted Benzannulation of α,β-Unsaturated Compounds and Alkynes
Published on: December 16, 2019
07:06A Microwave-Assisted Direct Heteroarylation of Ketones Using Transition Metal Catalysis
Published on: February 16, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Anions: Structural Overview
Due to the absence of continuous...
Five-Membered Heterocyclic Aromatic Compounds: Overview
Aromatic Hydrocarbon Cations: Structural Overview
Removing one hydrogen from the intervening CH2 group...
Regioselectivity and Stereochemistry of Acid-Catalyzed Hydration
Aldehydes and Ketones with Water: Hydrate Formation
The formation of hydrates is a reversible reaction. Hydrate formation is influenced by steric and electronic factors accompanying the alkyl substituents on the carbonyl group: The rate of hydrate formation increases with a decrease in the number of alkyl groups attached to the carbonyl carbon. Hence,...
Formation of Halohydrin from Alkenes