Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Variation in Preferences for Long-Acting Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Among US Men Who Have Sex with Men: A
S Wilson Beckham1, Travis Sanchez2, Rebecca Fowler1
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Cabotegravir long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA PrEP) is effective. User preferences show side effects are a key concern, followed by cost and stigma, influencing uptake among men who have sex with men.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- HIV Prevention
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- Cabotegravir long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA PrEP) offers an effective HIV prevention strategy with a favorable safety profile.
- Understanding user preferences is crucial for optimizing the implementation and effectiveness of LA PrEP, particularly among key populations like men who have sex with men (MSM).
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore potential user preferences for hypothetical long-acting injectable HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (LA PrEP) attributes among sexually active HIV-negative MSM.
- To identify distinct preference groups and understand the relative importance of factors like cost, side effects, injection frequency, stigma, and service location.
Main Methods:
- An online discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was administered to 2241 HIV-negative MSM participants in the 2019 American Men's Internet Survey.
- Latent class analysis was used to segment respondents based on their preferences for hypothetical LA PrEP attributes, calculating relative importance weights and willingness-to-pay.
Main Results:
- 73% of respondents expressed likelihood to use LA PrEP. Three distinct preference classes were identified: 'side effects-averse' (64%), 'ambivalent' (20%), and 'cost-conscious' (16%).
- Perceived side effects were the most significant factor for the largest group. Cost was paramount for the 'cost-conscious' group, while stigma was more important for the 'ambivalent' group.
Conclusions:
- Perceived side effects represent a significant potential barrier to LA PrEP uptake among MSM. Addressing out-of-pocket costs is vital for increasing uptake and ensuring equitable access.
- Tailored communication strategies addressing specific concerns of different user segments are recommended to enhance LA PrEP implementation and effectiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into...
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Patient-Related Factors
Age stands as a key determinant in protein-drug binding. Neonates, characterized by low albumin content, experience heightened concentrations of unbound drugs such as phenytoin and...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...

