Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025
07:53
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: August 5, 2022
2.1K
Collective interactions, collaborative inhibition, and shared spatial knowledge
Teriitutea Quesnot1,2, Bernard Guelton3
1Univ Brest, CNRS, LETG - UMR 6554, Plouzané, France.
Memory (Hove, England)
|October 20, 2023
Summary
Collaborative inhibition affects spatial memory during group map drawing. However, using a mobile map with collective interactions can reduce this inhibition and improve sketch map accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Spatial Cognition
Background:
- Traditional research on spatial mental representations emphasizes individual mental maps and knowledge.
- This study shifts focus to collective interactions, collaborative memory, and spatial knowledge sharing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how collective interactions during environmental exploration and group drawing influence collaborative inhibition.
- To assess the impact of these interactions on the quality of collectively designed sketch maps.
Main Methods:
- In situ explorations with real-time tracking in Plaine St-Denis, France.
- 118 participants were divided into three groups: solo exploration (no device), solo exploration (mobile app), and collective exploration (enhanced mobile app with interaction features).
- Comparison of entities on individual mental maps versus collective sketch maps.
Main Results:
- Collaborative inhibition was observed in spatial memory recall.
- The use of a mobile mapping application, especially with collective interaction features, mitigated collaborative inhibition.
- Collective interactions enhanced the accuracy of the collaboratively produced sketch maps.
Conclusions:
- Collaborative inhibition is a factor in spatial memory, impacting collective map creation.
- Technology-mediated collective interactions can overcome collaborative inhibition in spatial tasks.
- Further research is needed to understand the impact of these interactions on group dynamics.
Related Concept Videos
01:04Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
04:49Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
01:37Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
01:31In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
01:34Groupthink
44.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.4K
01:06Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving
4.2K
In multiple dimensions, the conservation of momentum applies in each direction independently. Hence, to solve collisions in multiple dimensions, we should write down the momentum conservation in each direction separately. To help understand collisions in multiple dimensions, consider an example.
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
4.2K