Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Computerized Dynamic Posturography for Postural Control Assessment in Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Published on: December 11, 2013
Ipsilateral Healthy-segment Response to Leg Length Discrepancy
John G Birch1, Marina R Makarov, Chan-Hee Jo
1Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Dallas, TX.
Background:
Few studies address frequency or magnitude of healthy lower-extremity segment response to ipsilateral companion segment shortening. We sought to document and quantify this occurrence in a variety of pediatric etiologies.
Methods:
We reviewed the medical record and radiographs of patients undergoing epiphysiodesis to manage leg length discrepancy. Inclusion criteria for this study were leg length discrepancy of a single lower-extremity segment by identifiable cause and adequate scanograms to allow accurate measurement of all 4 lower-extremity segments before any surgical treatment for the discrepancy. We recorded the etiology of shortening, age of onset of disorder, the length of the lower-extremity segments on scanograms, and age at the time of radiographs. We considered ipsilateral healthy-segment difference from the contralateral ≥ 0.5 cm. as clinically significant.
Results:
Two hundred nine patients met inclusion criteria (126 boys, 83 girls). The average age was 12.5 years. 16/60 patients with avascular necrosis of the hip demonstrated ipsilateral tibial shortening averaging 1.2 cm whereas 6/60 demonstrated ipsilateral tibial overgrowth averaging 0.6 cm. 11/30 Legg-Perthés patients demonstrated ipsilateral tibial shortening averaging 0.7 cm; none had ipsilateral tibial overgrowth. 10/42 posteromedial bow patients had ipsilateral femoral shortening averaging 0.8 cm, whereas 6/42 had ipsilateral overgrowth averaging 0.8 cm. 13/48 with distal femoral physeal injury demonstrated ipsilateral tibial shortening averaging 1.2 cm, whereas 6/48 demonstrated ipsilateral tibial overgrowth averaging 0.8 cm. 8/29 tibial physeal injuries (proximal or distal) demonstrated ipsilateral femoral shortening averaging 1.1 cm. whereas 7/29 demonstrated ipsilateral femoral overgrowth averaging 0.7 cm.
Conclusions:
Although there are individual exceptions, the ipsilateral healthy segment does not grow appreciably more than the contralateral in patients with avascular necrosis of the hip, Legg-Perthés disease, or physeal trauma. The femur is not a significant component of shortening in patients with posteromedial bow.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, retrospective review.
More Related Videos
11:06Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: February 19, 2019
07:52Evaluating Postural Control and Lower-extremity Muscle Activation in Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability
Published on: September 18, 2020