Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
Published on: October 21, 2022
Corneal Stress Distribution Evolves from Thickness-Driven in Normal Corneas to Curvature-Driven with Progression in
Cynthia J Roberts1,2, Kayla M Knoll1,3, Ashraf M Mahmoud1,2
1Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Purpose:
To introduce the novel parameter of Corneal Contribution to Stress (CCS) and compare stress distribution patterns between keratoconus (KCN) and normal corneas.
Design:
Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study.
Participants:
The study included 66 eyes of 40 subjects diagnosed with KCN and 155 left eyes from 155 normal control (NRL) subjects.
Methods:
Tomography was obtained to calculate the newly proposed CCS, defined according to the hoop stress formula without intraocular pressure, R/2t, where R is the radius of curvature and t is the thickness. CCS maps were calculated from pachymetry and tangential curvature maps. Custom software identified the 2-mm-diameter zones of greatest curvature (Cspot-max), thinnest pachymetry (Pach-min), greatest stress (CCSmax), and lowest stress (CCSmin). Stress difference (CCSdiff) was calculated as CCSmax - CCSmin. Distances between Cspot-max vs. Pach-min, vs. CCSmax, and vs. CCSmin, as well as between Pach-min vs. CCSmax and vs. CCSmin, were calculated. t tests were performed between cohorts, and paired t tests were performed within cohorts. Univariate linear regression analyses were performed between parameters and distances. The significance threshold was P < 0.05.
Main Outcome Measures:
Corneal stress parameters, corneal features of maximum curvature, minimum thickness, and distances between corneal stress parameters and corneal features.
Results:
CCSmax was significantly closer to Pach-min (0.79 ± 0.92) and Cspot-max (2.04 ± 0.85) than CCSmin (3.17 ± 0.38, 2.73 ± 1.53, respectively) in NRL, P < 0.0001, whereas CCSmin was significantly closer to Cspot-max (1.35 ± 1.43) than CCSmax (2.52 ± 0.72) in KCN, P < 0.0001. Cspot-max (severity) was significantly related to CCSdiff in KCN (P < 0.0001; R = 0.5882) with a weak relationship in NRL (P < 0.0080, R = 0.0451). Cspot-max was significantly related to the distance from Pach-min to CCSmax (P < 0.0001; R = 0.3737) without significance in NRL (P = 0.8011).
Conclusions:
Corneal stress is driven by thickness in NRL, with greatest stress at thinnest pachymetry and greatest curvature. However, maximum stress moves away from thinnest pachymetry with progression in KCN, and minimum stress is associated with maximum curvature. Severity in KCN is significantly related to greater difference between maximum and minimum stress, consistent with the biomechanical cycle of decompensation.
Financial Disclosures:
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
More Related Videos
04:00Author Spotlight: Establishing a Practical and Cost-Effective Protocol for Corneal Sensitivity Testing in Clinical Settings
Published on: August 2, 2024
07:29Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Stress Concentrations
Normal Stress
When a rod is under axial loading, the internal forces and corresponding stress are normal to the plane of the section, so it is termed normal stress. It's...
Transformation of Plane Stress
Principal Stresses
General State of Stress
Specifically, consider a tetrahedral element where one face, labeled XYZ, is perpendicular to the line OA, and the remaining faces align with the coordinate axes with point O as the origin. At any point, such as point O, the stress tensor can be used to determine the stress...
Components of Stress
Interestingly, the hidden cube faces also experience these stresses, equal and...