Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Reprogramming Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts with Transcription Factors to Induce a Hemogenic Program
Published on: December 16, 2016
Deciphering the decisive factors driving fate bifurcations in somatic cell reprogramming.
Chunshen Long1, Hanshuang Li1, Pengfei Liang1
1State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Regulation and Breeding of Grassland Livestock, Institutes of Biomedical Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, China.
Somatic cell reprogramming involves continuous cell fate transitions. This study identifies key factors driving induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) towards stromal-like cells (SLCs) or trophoblast-like cells (TLCs) to improve reprogramming efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Stem Cell Biology
- Epigenetics
- Developmental Biology
Background:
- Somatic cell reprogramming is a dynamic process with intermediates facing molecular bottlenecks.
- Understanding cell fate decisions is crucial for efficient reprogramming to pluripotency.
- Previous studies highlight the mesenchymal-epithelial transition and pluripotency network activation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify decisive factors governing cell fate bifurcations during induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) reprogramming.
- To elucidate the molecular drivers leading to stromal-like cells (SLCs) versus trophoblast-like cells (TLCs) differentiation.
- To provide insights for enhancing reprogramming efficiency by manipulating cell fate trajectories.
Main Methods:
- Reconstruction of cellular trajectories to identify iPSCs/SLCs and iPSCs/TLCs fate bifurcations.
- Analysis of gene regulatory networks to pinpoint key transcription factors.
- Comparative analysis of gene expression patterns associated with different cell fates.
Main Results:
- Successful reprogramming involves mesenchymal-epithelial transition and pluripotency network activation.
- iPSC/SLC fate is linked to cell cycle inhibition and extracellular matrix gene activation.
- iPSC/TLC fate is characterized by up-regulation of placenta development genes.
- Seven factors (e.g., Taf7, Ezh2, Klf2) drive iPSCs/SLCs reprogramming, while three (e.g., Cdc5l, Klf4, Nanog) drive iPSCs/TLCs bifurcation.
- Eleven factors (e.g., Cebpb, Sox4, Junb) promote SLC fate, and four factors (e.g., Gata2, Jund, Ctnnb1) promote TLC fate.
Conclusions:
- Specific gene regulatory networks and key factors dictate cell fate decisions during reprogramming.
- Identifying these drivers offers a strategy to avoid alternative fates and improve reprogramming outcomes.
- This research deepens the understanding of cell fate determination in the context of induced pluripotency.
Related Concept Videos
Somatic to iPS Cell Reprogramming
Methods of Nuclear Reprogramming
Introduction to Nuclear Reprogramming
Lineage Commitment
Molecular Factors Affecting Cell Division
Several proteins function as internal regulators to ensure each cell cycle stage is completed faithfully before proceeding to the next. Regulator molecules may act directly or influence the activity or production of other...
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic...

