Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025
Mouse Model of Surgical Uterine Injury and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes
Published on: June 27, 2025
A quantitative analysis framework of placenta accreta spectrum: placenta subtype, intraoperative bleeding, and
Huancheng Yang1,2,3, Xiang Wu4, Weihao Liu2
1Department of Luohu Clinical Institute, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Background:
Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to develop a quantitative analysis framework utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-anatomical-clinical features to predict 3 clinically significant parameters in patients with PAS: placenta subtype (invasive vs. non-invasive placenta), intraoperative bleeding (≥1,500 vs. <1,500 mL), and hysterectomy risk (hysterectomy vs. non-hysterectomy).
Methods:
A total of 125 pregnant women with PAS from 2 medical centers were enrolled into an internal training set and an external testing set. Some 21 MRI-anatomical-clinical features were integrated as input into the framework. The proposed quantitative analytic framework contains mainly 3 classifiers built by extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and their testing in external datasets. We also further compared the accuracy of placenta subtype prediction between the proposed model and 4 radiologists. A quantitative model interpretation method called SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was conducted to explore the contribution of each feature.
Results:
The placenta subtype (invasive vs. non-invasive), intraoperative bleeding (≥1,500 vs. <1,500 mL), and hysterectomy risk (hysterectomy vs. non-hysterectomy) demonstrated impressive area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values of 0.93, 0.88, and 0.90, respectively, in the internal validation set. Even in the external testing set, these metrics maintained their strength, achieving AUROC values of 0.91, 0.82, and 0.82, respectively. Comparing our proposed framework to the 4 radiologists, our model exhibited superior accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity in predicting placental subtypes within the external testing cohort. The features associated with intraplacental dark T2 bands played a crucial role in the decision-making process of all 3 prediction models.
Conclusions:
The quantitative analysis framework can provide a robust method for classification of placenta subtype (invasive vs. non-invasive placenta), intraoperative bleeding (≥1,500 vs. <1,500 mL), and hysterectomy risk (hysterectomy vs. non-hysterectomy) based on MRI-anatomical-clinical features in PAS.
