Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wicking pumps for microfluidics.

Biomicrofluidics·2024
Same author

A Comparative Study on the Effects of Spray Coating Methods and Substrates on Polyurethane/Carbon Nanofiber Sensors.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2023
Same author

Pumpless deterministic lateral displacement separation using a paper capillary wick.

Lab on a chip·2023
Same author

Wearable Sensors for Remote Health Monitoring: Potential Applications for Early Diagnosis of Covid-19.

Advanced materials technologies·2021
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering
10:27

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering

Published on: July 10, 2016

9.1K

A review on inertial microfluidic fabrication methods.

Zohreh Akbari1, Mohammad Amin Raoufi, Sheyda Mirjalali2

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Biomicrofluidics
|October 23, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review details microfabrication techniques for inertial microfluidic devices. It analyzes methods like 3D printing and photolithography to enhance particle manipulation efficiency and resolution.

More Related Videos

High Throughput Microfluidic Rapid and Low Cost Prototyping Packaging Methods
07:51

High Throughput Microfluidic Rapid and Low Cost Prototyping Packaging Methods

Published on: December 23, 2013

7.4K
Rapid Fabrication of Custom Microfluidic Devices for Research and Educational Applications
05:33

Rapid Fabrication of Custom Microfluidic Devices for Research and Educational Applications

Published on: November 20, 2019

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering
10:27

Microfluidic Buffer Exchange for Interference-free Micro/Nanoparticle Cell Engineering

Published on: July 10, 2016

9.1K
High Throughput Microfluidic Rapid and Low Cost Prototyping Packaging Methods
07:51

High Throughput Microfluidic Rapid and Low Cost Prototyping Packaging Methods

Published on: December 23, 2013

7.4K
Rapid Fabrication of Custom Microfluidic Devices for Research and Educational Applications
05:33

Rapid Fabrication of Custom Microfluidic Devices for Research and Educational Applications

Published on: November 20, 2019

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Microfluidics and Lab-on-a-Chip Technology
  • Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science and Engineering

Background:

  • Inertial microfluidics offers high throughput and label-free particle manipulation, driven by hydrodynamic forces within microchannels.
  • The efficiency of inertial microfluidic systems is critically dependent on microchannel geometry, influencing particle focusing.
  • Novel microchannel designs aim to improve particle manipulation, but their fabrication presents significant challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To comprehensively review and discuss microfabrication techniques applicable to inertial microfluidic channels.
  • To analyze the advantages and disadvantages of various fabrication methods concerning resolution, structural complexity, cost, and materials.
  • To provide insights for selecting appropriate fabrication techniques to optimize particle harvesting yield and resolution in inertial microfluidics.

Main Methods:

  • Photolithography
  • Xurography
  • Laser Cutting
  • Micromachining
  • Microwire Technique
  • Etching
  • Hot Embossing
  • 3D Printing
  • Injection Molding

Main Results:

  • A detailed overview of diverse microfabrication approaches for inertial microchannels is presented.
  • Comparative analysis of techniques based on key performance metrics such as resolution, structural capabilities, cost-effectiveness, and material compatibility.
  • Identification of fabrication challenges associated with unconventional microchannel structures.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of microfabrication technique significantly impacts the performance of inertial microfluidic devices.
  • Understanding the trade-offs of each method is crucial for advancing particle manipulation in microfluidics.
  • This review serves as a guide for researchers to select optimal fabrication strategies for improved device performance.