Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Whole Kidney, Medulla, and Cortical Tubules in Diabetic Pathogenesis of Kidney Injury in Mice
Published on: May 2, 2025
Performance of urinary vitamin D-binding protein in diabetic kidney disease: a meta-analysis
Haoshuang Chen1, Lihua Ni1, Xiaoyan Wu1,2
1Department of Nephrology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Abstract:
Objective: To systematically evaluate the correlation between urinary vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) and diabetic kidney disease and to evaluate the relationship between urinary VDBP and the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), renal function indicators [estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine (CR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN)] and glycaemic control indices [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG)].Methods: We searched the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science databases up to May 31, 2023, for relevant literature. RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis.Results: Ultimately, 9 articles were included. Due to heterogeneity in the pooled results, the random-effects model was chosen. Meta-analysis results showed that the urinary VDBP concentrations in the normal albuminuria diabetes group were significantly higher than those in the healthy control group [SMD 1.52, 95% CI (0.84, 2.19), p < 0.00001]. The urinary VDBP concentrations in the microalbuminuria diabetes group were significantly higher than those in the normal albuminuria diabetes group [SMD 1.81, 95% CI (1.40, 2.21), p < 0.00001]. The urinary VDBP concentrations in the macroalbuminuria diabetes group were also significantly higher than those in the microalbuminuria diabetes group [SMD 1.51, 95% CI (1.05, 1.96), p < 0.00001]. In addition, urinary VDBP was positively correlated with the ACR, CR, BUN and HbA1c [Summary r = 0.73, 95% CI (0.54, 0.85), p < 0.0001; Summary r = 0.38, 95% CI (0.10, 0.61), p = 0.009; Summary r = 0.37, 95% CI (0.16, 0.55), p = 0.0008; Summary r = 0.40, 95% CI (0.13, 0.62), p = 0.005, respectively] and tended to be negatively correlated with the eGFR [Summary r = -0.64, 95% CI (-0.92, 0.10), p = 0.08] but was not significantly correlated with the FPG [Summary r = 0.16, 95% CI (-0.03, 0.33), p = 0.10]. Sensitivity analysis showed that our pooled results are robust.Conclusion: Urinary VDBP may be used as a novel biomarker for the early diagnosis of DKD and can be used to assess the severity of DKD.
Related Concept Videos
Serum Studies: Renal Function Tests
Urine Studies I: Urinalysis
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
Nephrotic Syndrome II : Assessment and Medical Management

