Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Using 22C3 Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Concentrate on Biopsy and Cytology Samples from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Published on: September 25, 2018
First-Line Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab in RET Fusion-Positive NSCLC
Caicun Zhou1, Benjamin Solomon1, Herbert H Loong1
1From Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine (C.Z.), and the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University (B.H.), Shanghai, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong (H.H.L.), and the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou (J.Z.) - all in China; Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (B.S.); Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (K.P.); Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France (M.P.); Hospital del Mar, Barcelona (E.A.); the Department of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria San Luigi-Orbassano, University of Turin, Turin (S.N.), and IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna (A.A.) - both in Italy; Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, University of São Paulo Medical School and Instituto D'Or de Ensino e Pesquisa (M.P.M.), and the Oncology Center, Hospital Śırio Libanês (F.C.S.) - both in São Paulo; the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Y.Y.E.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York (A.D.); the Center for Integrated Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (J.W.); Loxo@Lilly (H.H.) and Eli Lilly (N.P., M.K.U., D.R., T.P., V.S., A.B.L., B.K.L.) - both in Indianapolis; and National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan (K.G.).
Background:
Selpercatinib, a highly selective potent and brain-penetrant RET inhibitor, was shown to have efficacy in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a nonrandomized phase 1-2 study.
Methods:
In a randomized phase 3 trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of first-line selpercatinib as compared with control treatment that consisted of platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab at the investigator's discretion. The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review in both the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population (i.e., patients whose physicians had planned to treat them with pembrolizumab in the event that they were assigned to the control group) and the overall intention-to-treat population. Crossover from the control group to the selpercatinib group was allowed if disease progression as assessed by blinded independent central review occurred during receipt of control treatment.
Results:
In total, 212 patients underwent randomization in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population. At the time of the preplanned interim efficacy analysis, median progression-free survival was 24.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9 to not estimable) with selpercatinib and 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 16.8) with control treatment (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.70; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with an objective response was 84% (95% CI, 76 to 90) with selpercatinib and 65% (95% CI, 54 to 75) with control treatment. The cause-specific hazard ratio for the time to progression affecting the central nervous system was 0.28 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.68). Efficacy results in the overall intention-to-treat population (261 patients) were similar to those in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab population. The adverse events that occurred with selpercatinib and control treatment were consistent with those previously reported.
Conclusions:
Treatment with selpercatinib led to significantly longer progression-free survival than platinum-based chemotherapy with or without pembrolizumab among patients with advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC. (Funded by Eli Lilly and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04194944.).
Insights
First-line selpercatinib significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with advanced RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to chemotherapy. This RET inhibitor demonstrated superior efficacy and response rates, offering a new standard of care for this patient population.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Genetics
Background:
- Selpercatinib is a potent, selective, and brain-penetrant RET inhibitor.
- Previous studies indicated selpercatinib's efficacy in advanced RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- This study aimed to confirm these findings in a larger, randomized trial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line selpercatinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC.
- To compare progression-free survival (PFS) as the primary endpoint.
- To assess objective response rates and central nervous system (CNS) progression.
Main Methods:
- A randomized phase 3 trial compared first-line selpercatinib against platinum-based chemotherapy (with or without pembrolizumab).
- The primary endpoint was PFS, assessed by blinded independent central review.
- Patients were analyzed in the intention-to-treat-pembrolizumab and overall intention-to-treat populations, with crossover allowed upon progression.
Main Results:
- Selpercatinib demonstrated a median PFS of 24.8 months versus 11.2 months for control treatment (hazard ratio: 0.46; P<0.001).
- Objective response rates were 84% for selpercatinib compared to 65% for control.
- Selpercatinib significantly reduced the risk of CNS progression (hazard ratio: 0.28).
Conclusions:
- First-line selpercatinib significantly improves progression-free survival in advanced RET fusion-positive NSCLC.
- Selpercatinib represents a superior treatment option compared to platinum-based chemotherapy for this patient group.
- The findings support selpercatinib as a new standard of care.
More Related Videos
07:59Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
07:29Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Treatment Resistant Cancers