Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Outcomes of Provisional Stenting With Versus Without Side Branch Intervention in Patients With Bifurcation
Clément Servoz1, Anthony Matta2, Vincent Bataille1
1Department of Cardiology, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Insights
For ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from coronary bifurcation lesions, simple provisional stenting without side branch intervention demonstrated comparable 1-year survival outcomes. This approach showed a low mortality rate, supporting its use in managing these complex coronary artery cases.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Coronary bifurcation lesions present complex challenges in percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Optimal strategies for managing side branches during stenting remain debated.
- ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) necessitates timely and effective treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare 1-year survival outcomes between provisional stenting with and without side branch intervention in STEMI patients.
- To evaluate the impact of additional side branch procedures on mortality.
- To define parameters guiding intervention in coronary bifurcation lesions.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study of 132 STEMI patients with large, non-left main coronary bifurcation lesions.
- Patients were treated with provisional stenting, with or without side branch intervention (ballooning or kissing technique).
- 1-year survival status was assessed post-discharge.
Main Results:
- Side branch intervention was performed in 34.1% of patients.
- Overall 1-year all-cause mortality was 7.8 per 100 person-years.
- Survival analyses revealed no significant difference in 1-year survival outcomes between groups (HR 1.55; P=.513).
Conclusions:
- Simple provisional stenting without side branch intervention is a safe and effective strategy for STEMI patients with large coronary bifurcation lesions.
- This approach is associated with low mortality rates and comparable survival outcomes to more complex interventions.
- Further research may clarify specific indications for side branch intervention in bifurcation lesions.
Abstract:
To date, the best approach to coronary bifurcation lesion remains unsettled, and the parameters to guide side branch ballooning or stenting are not yet defined. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes after provisional stenting with versus without side branch intervention. A cohort was conducted on 132 patients who underwent coronary angiography at Toulouse University Hospital for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with large culprit nonleft main coronary bifurcation lesion. Study participants were divided into 2 groups depending on the performance or not of a side branch intervention. We observed the living status at 1-year after hospital discharge. Side branch intervention by balloon inflation or final balloon kissing technique was performed in 34.1% of study participants. At 1-year follow-up, the incidence of all-cause mortality was 7.8 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1 to 15), and although it seemed higher in the side branch intervention group (10 per 100 person-years [95% CI 3.8 to 26.7] vs 6.6 per 100 persons-years [95% CI 2.8 to 15.9]), the survival analyses showed no differences in survival outcomes (hazard ratio side branch intervention 1.55 [0.42 to 5.78], p = 0.513). In conclusion, in the setting of a coronary bifurcation causing ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, simple provisional stenting without side branch intervention showed a low mortality rate and no differences in the 1-year survival outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care

