An MRI-based grading system for preoperative risk estimation of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy

Lili Xu1,2, Gumuyang Zhang1, Daming Zhang1

  • 1Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.

Insights Into Imaging
|October 23, 2023
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study developed simplified MRI grading systems (mrPSM1 and mrPSM2) to predict positive surgical margins (PSM) after prostatectomy. These systems, using features like capsule contact length and extraprostatic extension, offer high specificity for risk stratification.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Urology

Background:

  • Predicting positive surgical margin (PSM) status after radical prostatectomy (RP) is crucial for prostate cancer management.
  • Current prediction methods may lack simplicity or sufficient specificity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate simplified MRI-based grading systems for predicting PSM after RP.
  • To assess the performance of these systems in terms of accuracy and specificity.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective enrollment of patients undergoing prostate MRI and RP into derivation (2017-2021) and validation (2021-2022) cohorts.
  • Evaluation of MRI features including capsule contact length (CCL), extraprostatic extension (EPE), and apex abutting by a single radiologist.
  • Development of two grading systems (mrPSM1 and mrPSM2) using logistic regression and decision tree analysis; performance assessed by AUC, sensitivity, and specificity.

Main Results:

  • PSM rates were 29.8% in the derivation and 36.4% in the validation cohorts.
  • mrPSM1 (CCL ≥ 20 mm, apex abutting) and mrPSM2 (including EPE) showed AUCs of 0.705/0.713 (derivation) and 0.672-0.686 (validation).
  • The proposed systems demonstrated significantly higher specificity (0.732-0.750) compared to a previous model (0.411) in the validation cohort, with good interreader agreement (kappa=0.764-0.776).

Conclusions:

  • Simplified MRI-based grading systems (mrPSM1, mrPSM2) can effectively predict PSM after RP.
  • These systems offer high specificity, aiding in preoperative risk stratification.
  • The mrPSM systems are easily interpretable and may improve prostate cancer management decisions.