Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

181
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
181

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Attention and social problems are uniquely associated with academic achievement beyond overall psychopathology: multicohort replication in 3,800 participants.

Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines·2026
Same author

Temporally-resolved deep learning reveals autism symptom-specific neural signatures during naturalistic social experiences.

Research square·2026
Same author

Nonergodicity and Simpson's paradox in neurocognitive dynamics of cognitive control.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Latent brain state dynamics predict early amyloid accumulation and cognitive impairment.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Ovulatory Recovery following weight loss in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and obesity: a post hoc analysis of the BAMBINI randomised controlled trial.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Biophysical mechanisms of default mode network function and dysfunction.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Are Semantic Representations Stable? A Bayesian Framework Applied to the Study of Quantifier Meaning.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same journal

When Collaboration Falters, Insensitivity to How Our Actions Affect Others Drives Inflated Self-evaluations.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same journal

Finding Closure: A Closer Look at the Gestalt Law of Closure in Convolutional Neural Networks.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same journal

Joint Cognitive Models Reveal Sources of Robust Individual Differences in Conflict Processing.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same journal

Learning to Move and Plan like the Knight: Sequential Decision Making with a Novel Motor Mapping.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same journal

Quantifying individual variability in neural control circuit regulation using single-subject fMRI.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.7K

A Multinomial Processing Tree Model of the 2-back Working Memory Task.

Michael D Lee1, Percy K Mistry2, Vinod Menon2,3,4

  • 1Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.

Computational Brain & Behavior
|October 24, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We introduce a new cognitive model for the 2-back task, enhancing working memory and inhibition measurement. This model offers interpretable parameters for individual differences in cognitive processes.

Keywords:
2-back taskBayesian methodsHuman Connectome ProjectMultinomial processing treesPsychometric modelsn-back task

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K
Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity
10:43

Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity

Published on: July 1, 2014

15.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
07:01

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment

Published on: September 20, 2020

4.7K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

9.9K
Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity
10:43

Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity

Published on: July 1, 2014

15.2K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • The 2-back task is a standard measure of working memory and inhibitory control.
  • Existing models may not fully dissociate underlying cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel computational model for the 2-back task using Multinomial Processing Trees.
  • To provide interpretable parameters for memory, decision-making, and response bias.
  • To apply and validate the model on diverse datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a three-parameter model (memory, decision, base-rate) within the Multinomial Processing Trees framework.
  • Tested parameter recovery using existing 2-back experimental designs.
  • Applied the model to datasets from social psychology (racial face perception) and cognitive neuroscience (Human Connectome Project).

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the model's ability to recover parameters and infer individual-level cognitive processes.
  • Extended the model hierarchically to compare stimulus conditions (e.g., different races).
  • Utilized a multivariate regression extension to link model parameters with performance on other cognitive tasks (List Sorting, Flanker).

Conclusions:

  • The novel model effectively dissociates cognitive processes like encoding, inhibition, and binding failures in the 2-back task.
  • The model provides a flexible framework for analyzing working memory and inhibition across different research domains.
  • This approach facilitates a deeper understanding of individual differences in cognitive control.