Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
Published on: April 19, 2024
Enpatoran in COVID-19 pneumonia: Safety and efficacy results from a phase II randomized trial
John E McKinnon1, Joel Santiaguel2, Claudia Murta de Oliveira3
1Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Abstract:
Enpatoran is a selective inhibitor of toll-like receptors 7 and 8 (TLR7/8) that potentially targets pro-inflammatory pathways induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A phase II study conducted in Brazil, the Philippines, and the USA during the early pandemic phase assessed the safety and efficacy of enpatoran in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia (NCT04448756). A total of 149 patients, who scored 4 on the World Health Organization's (WHO) 9-point ordinal severity scale, were randomized 1:1:1 and received enpatoran 50 mg (n = 54) or 100 mg (n = 46), or placebo (n = 49) twice daily (b.i.d.) for 14 days plus standard of care. The primary objectives were safety and time to recovery (WHO 9-point scale ≤3). Clinical deterioration (WHO 9-point scale ≥ 5) was a key secondary objective. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable across groups (56.5%-63.0%). Treatment-related TEAEs were numerically higher with enpatoran 50 mg (14.8%) than 100 mg (10.9%) or placebo (8.2%). Serious TEAEs were numerically lower with enpatoran (50 mg 9.3%, 100 mg 2.2%) than placebo (18.4%). The primary efficacy objective was not met; median time to recovery was 3.4-3.9 days across groups, with placebo-treated patients recovering on average faster than anticipated. Clinical deterioration event-free rates up to Day 7 were 90.6%, 95.6%, and 81.6% with enpatoran 50 mg, 100 mg, and placebo, respectively. Enpatoran was well tolerated by patients acutely ill and hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. Positive signals in some secondary end points suggested potential beneficial effects, supporting further evaluation of enpatoran in patients with hyperinflammation due to infection or autoimmunity.
Insights
Enpatoran, a toll-like receptor 7/8 inhibitor, showed comparable safety to placebo in hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia patients. While not meeting primary efficacy goals, it demonstrated potential benefits in secondary outcomes, warranting further investigation for hyperinflammatory conditions.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces pro-inflammatory pathways.
- Toll-like receptors 7 and 8 (TLR7/8) play a role in the inflammatory response to viral infections.
- Enpatoran is a selective inhibitor of TLR7/8, investigated for its potential to modulate these pathways.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the safety and efficacy of enpatoran in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.
- To evaluate enpatoran's effect on time to recovery and clinical deterioration.
Main Methods:
- A Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT04448756) was conducted.
- 149 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia received enpatoran (50 mg or 100 mg) or placebo twice daily for 14 days.
- Primary endpoints included safety and time to recovery (WHO 9-point scale ≤3); clinical deterioration (WHO 9-point scale ≥5) was a secondary endpoint.
Main Results:
- Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across all groups.
- Serious adverse events were numerically lower in enpatoran groups compared to placebo.
- The primary efficacy endpoint was not met; median time to recovery was similar across groups, with placebo showing faster-than-expected recovery.
Conclusions:
- Enpatoran was well-tolerated in patients with acute, hospitalized COVID-19 pneumonia.
- Some secondary endpoints suggested potential beneficial effects, particularly regarding clinical deterioration.
- Further research into enpatoran for hyperinflammatory conditions, including those from infection or autoimmunity, is supported.
More Related Videos
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017
05:39Author Spotlight: A Non-Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery with Multimodal Analgesia and Sevoflurane Inhalation Anesthesia
Published on: May 26, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pneumonia V: Nursing management and Prevention
The nurse must practice strict medical asepsis and adhere to infection control guidelines to minimize healthcare-associated infections.
Enhance airway patency
Position the patient correctly to facilitate drainage of the affected lung segments. Manual or mechanical percussion and vibration can also be employed....
Pneumonia IV: Management
Bacterial Pneumonia Treatment
For bacterial pneumonia, antibiotics serve as the cornerstone of therapy. Initial treatment often begins with empirical antibiotics, tailored to the anticipated causative organism and adjusted based on culture results. Key antibiotic choices include:
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Risk Factors
Various factors influence the likelihood of developing pneumonia. Age plays a crucial role, with infants, children under two, and individuals over 65 at increased risk due to their...