Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
S-Diagnostic─An a Posteriori Error Assessment for Single-Reference Coupled-Cluster Methods
Fabian M Faulstich1, Håkon E Kristiansen2, Mihaly A Csirik2,3
1Department of Mathematics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, United States.
Abstract:
We propose a novel a posteriori error assessment for the single-reference coupled-cluster (SRCC) method called the S-diagnostic. We provide a derivation of the S-diagnostic that is rooted in the mathematical analysis of different SRCC variants. We numerically scrutinized the S-diagnostic, testing its performance for (1) geometry optimizations, (2) electronic correlation simulations of systems with varying numerical difficulty, and (3) the square-planar copper complexes [CuCl4]2-, [Cu(NH3)4]2+, and [Cu(H2O)4]2+. Throughout the numerical investigations, the S-diagnostic is compared to other SRCC diagnostic procedures, that is, the T1, D1, max T2, and D2 diagnostics as well as different indices of multideterminantal and multireference character in coupled-cluster theory. Our numerical investigations show that the S-diagnostic outperforms the T1, D1, max T2 and D2 diagnostics and is comparable to the indices of multideterminantal and multireference character in coupled-cluster theory in their individual fields of applicability. The experiments investigating the performance of the S-diagnostic for geometry optimizations using SRCC reveal that the S-diagnostic correlates well with different error measures at a high level of statistical relevance. The experiments investigating the performance of the S-diagnostic for electronic correlation simulations show that the S-diagnostic correctly predicts strong multireference regimes. The S-diagnostic, moreover, correctly detects the successful SRCC computations for [CuCl4]2-, [Cu(NH3)4]2+, and [Cu(H2O)4]2+, which have been known to be misdiagnosed by T1 and D1 diagnostics in the past. This shows that the S-diagnostic is a promising candidate for an a posteriori diagnostic for SRCC calculations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...

