Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

11:08
Proofreading and DNA Repair Assay Using Single Nucleotide Extension and MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry Analysis
Published on: June 19, 2018
9.8K
Testing for deficient mismatch repair and microsatellite instability : A focused update
Josef Rüschoff1, Hans-Ulrich Schildhaus2, Jan Hendrik Rüschoff3
1Discovery Life Sciences Biomarker GmbH and North Hesse Pathology, Germaniastr. 7, 34119, Kassel, Germany. josef.rueschoff@dls.com.
Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)
|October 24, 2023
Summary
Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) testing are crucial for colorectal cancer diagnostics and predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy response. This review updates dMMR/MSI testing strategies for both colorectal and other cancers.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Cancer Research
Background:
- Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) testing are integral to colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnostics.
- Initially linked to Lynch syndrome (LS), MSI testing is now pivotal for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
- ICI therapies are expanding to non-CRC indications like endometrial, gastric, and biliary tract cancers, necessitating updated testing approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an updated review of dMMR/MSI testing methods.
- To address challenges in assessing immunohistochemical (IHC) stains and the utility of PCR-based procedures.
- To offer a practice-oriented flowchart for diagnostic decision-making, considering discordant results and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS).
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature and diagnostic guidelines for dMMR/MSI testing.
- Analysis of immunohistochemistry (IHC) and PCR-based methods for MSI detection.
- Evaluation of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) for clarifying discordant results.
- Inclusion of quality assurance measures and training recommendations.
Main Results:
- Updated recommendations and testing algorithms for primary CRC diagnosis are available.
- Challenges exist in assessing IHC stains, with PCR-based methods offering valuable insights.
- Discordances between MMR-IHC and MSI-PCR findings require careful consideration, with NGS as a potential clarifying tool.
- Systematic quality assurance and continuous training are essential for accurate dMMR/MSI testing.
Conclusions:
- dMMR/MSI testing is critical for both CRC diagnosis and guiding ICI therapy across various cancer types.
- A comprehensive approach integrating IHC, PCR, and potentially NGS is recommended for accurate assessment.
- Adherence to quality assurance protocols and ongoing education ensures reliable diagnostic outcomes.

