Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Delayed Intramyocardial Delivery of Stem Cells after Ischemia Reperfusion Injury in a Murine Model
Published on: September 3, 2020
The Evolving Paradigm of Revascularization in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: from Recovery of Systolic Function to
Ameesh Isath1, Julio A Panza2,3
1Department of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, 100 Woods Rd, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Insights
Reevaluating myocardial viability assessment is crucial for optimizing treatment in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). A shift towards a comprehensive understanding of ICM pathophysiology and revascularization benefits is needed for better patient selection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Myocardial viability assessment traditionally guides revascularization decisions in ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM).
- Previous retrospective studies suggested viability predicts revascularization benefits, influencing patient selection.
- Recent prospective trials present divergent findings, challenging traditional approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To reevaluate the role of myocardial viability assessment in guiding treatment strategies for ICM.
- To align treatment decisions with a contemporary understanding of revascularization's benefits in ICM.
- To explore a more nuanced approach beyond traditional binary viability assessment.
Main Methods:
- Review of contemporary data and prospective trials on myocardial viability in ICM.
- Analysis of the mechanism of benefit from revascularization in ICM.
- Conceptual reevaluation of traditional viability assessment paradigms.
Main Results:
- Traditional binary viability assessment may oversimplify the complexity of ICM.
- Prospective trial data suggest a divergence from earlier retrospective findings.
- A paradigm shift is needed from dichotomous viability assessment to a comprehensive approach.
Conclusions:
- Current viability assessment methods may not fully capture the benefits of revascularization in ICM.
- A deeper understanding of ICM pathophysiology and revascularization's effects is required.
- Future strategies should integrate a broader understanding of ICM for optimal patient management.
Purpose Of Review:
We aim to reevaluate how the assessment of myocardial viability can guide optimal treatment strategies for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) based on a more contemporary understanding of the mechanism of benefit of revascularization.
Recent Findings:
The assessment of viability in left ventricular (LV) segments with diminished contraction has been proposed as key to predict the benefit of revascularization and, therefore, as a requisite for the selection of patients to undergo this form of treatment. However, data from prospective trials have diverged from earlier retrospective studies. Traditional binary viability assessment may oversimplify ICM's complexity and the nuances of revascularization benefits. A conceptual shift from the traditional paradigm centered on the assessment of viability as a dichotomous variable to a more comprehensive approach encompassing a thorough understanding of ICM's complex pathophysiology and the salutary effect of revascularization in the prevention of myocardial infarction and ventricular arrhythmias is required.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Ischemic Heart Disease: Overview
Atherosclerosis, the primary malefactor, orchestrates this dangerous condition. It manifests as the accumulation of fatty deposits, akin to insidious plaques, within arterial walls. As time elapses, these plaques metamorphose, hardening and...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

