Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.0K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

201
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
201
Stratified Sampling Method01:16

Stratified Sampling Method

12.1K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
12.1K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

133
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
133
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

2.9K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bleeding Risk With Apixaban Versus Rivaroxaban: A Reference Trial Emulation Predicting the Results of COBRRA-VTE and COBRRA-AF Using US Health Care Claims.

Circulation. Population health and outcomes·2026
Same author

An Observational Study of Post-hip Fracture Outcomes in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

Continuing Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Into the First Trimester of Pregnancy and Pregnancy Outcomes : A Target Trial Emulation Study Using Claims Information.

Annals of internal medicine·2026
Same author

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Based Therapies and the Risk of Severe Gastrointestinal Motility Adverse Events: A Cohort Study.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2026
Same author

Systematic Evaluation of Data and Trial Fitness for Oncology Trial Emulation: Empirical Findings from the CARE Initiative.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2026
Same author

A Plasmode Simulation-Based Bias Analysis for Residual Confounding by Unmeasured Variables Leveraging Information-Rich Subsets.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of Metformin in Preventing Colorectal Cancer Among Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Target Trial Emulation.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

Trends in Pharmacist-Prescribed Dispensing Records of HIV Pre-Exposure (2020-2025) and Post-Exposure Prophylaxis (2020-2024) in Brazil: A Time Series Analysis.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

French Consumption of Methylphenidate in Primary Care From 2016 to 2023, Impact of Prescribing Policy Changes-A Time-Series Analysis.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

Uptake and Use of Biologic Therapies in Paediatric Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: An Australian Population-Based Study.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

Comparative Effectiveness of Oral Fluoropyrimidines Versus FOLFOX as Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Overlap-Weighted Restricted Mean Survival Time Analysis.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
Same journal

Association Between EGFR-TKI-Associated Skin Rash and Recorded Mortality in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Analysis Accounting for Immortal Time Bias.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

574

Stratified analysis in comparative effectiveness studies that emulate randomized trials.

Phyo T Htoo1, Robert J Glynn1, Shirley Wang1

  • 1Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
|October 25, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Pre-stratifying propensity score matching (PSM) in observational studies improves accuracy. This method yielded results closer to randomized trials, with only a minor increase in variance, enhancing reliability for real-world data analysis.

Keywords:
atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseasecomparative effectivenessempagliflozinepidemiologic methodspropensity scoretarget trialtype 2 diabetes

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

574
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.5K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Pharmacovigilance

Background:

  • Observational studies often use propensity score matching (PSM) to emulate randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
  • Preliminary stratification by key outcome predictors can enhance PSM by mimicking stratified randomization.
  • This approach may reduce bias and variance, lessening reliance on strict modeling assumptions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the impact of pre-stratification in propensity score matching (PSM) for observational cohort studies.
  • To compare effect estimates from stratified PSM versus total-cohort PSM using real-world data.
  • To evaluate if pre-stratification brings observational findings closer to established randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Two real-life observational studies involving Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes were analyzed.
  • Propensity scores (PS) were estimated and 1:1 matched using 143 pre-exposure covariates.
  • Comparisons were made between total-cohort PS matching and stratified PS matching (stratified by baseline cardiovascular disease).

Main Results:

  • Stratified PS matching yielded hazard ratios (HRs) closer to the null compared to total-cohort PS matching.
  • For empagliflozin vs. DPP-4 inhibitors, HRs were 13% higher with total-cohort PSM.
  • For empagliflozin vs. GLP-1 RAs, HRs were 9% higher with total-cohort PSM; variances increased minimally (2%-3%).

Conclusions:

  • Stratified PS matching produced effect estimates more aligned with expected findings from RCTs.
  • This method enhances the reliability of observational data by reducing confounding bias.
  • The minimal increase in variance associated with stratified PSM is a worthwhile trade-off for improved accuracy.