Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Public Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Residential Neighborhoods
Anne Juul Grabmayr1, Fredrik Folke2, Mads Christian Tofte Gregers1
1Research Department, Copenhagen University Hospital, Emergency Medical Services Capital Region of Denmark, Ballerup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Public out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in residential areas have lower survival rates due to fewer early interventions like CPR and defibrillation. Targeted efforts are needed to improve bystander response in neighborhoods.
Area of Science:
- Public health
- Emergency medicine
- Cardiology
Background:
- Public out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) predominantly occur in residential neighborhoods, yet their specific characteristics and outcomes are understudied.
- Understanding these factors is crucial for improving emergency response and patient survival rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the differences in pre-ambulance arrival interventions and survival rates for public OHCA patients in residential versus nonresidential areas.
- To identify potential disparities in emergency care delivery based on the location of cardiac arrest events.
Main Methods:
- A comparative analysis of public OHCA data from Vienna (2018-2021) and Copenhagen (2016-2020).
- Categorization of OHCA locations into residential neighborhoods and nonresidential areas.
- Statistical comparison of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), automated external defibrillator (AED) use, defibrillation, and 30-day survival rates using generalized estimation equation models.
Main Results:
- A significant proportion (68% in Vienna, 55% in Copenhagen) of public OHCAs occurred in residential neighborhoods.
- Residential areas showed lower rates of CPR, AED attachment, defibrillation, and 30-day survival compared to nonresidential areas.
- Combined analysis revealed significantly lower odds of receiving CPR (OR: 0.70), AED attachment (OR: 0.53), defibrillation (OR: 0.46), and 30-day survival (OR: 0.73) in residential neighborhoods.
Conclusions:
- Public OHCAs in residential neighborhoods experience fewer resuscitative efforts and have lower survival rates than those in nonresidential areas.
- There is a critical need for targeted interventions to enhance early CPR and defibrillation in residential settings.
- Improving bystander CPR and AED accessibility in neighborhoods is essential for better OHCA outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Bystander Effect

