Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The role of Coroners in perinatal death investigation in high-income countries: a scoping review.

Journal of perinatal medicine·2026
Same author

The Capacious Companion: Law, Lawyers and the Legal on Ethics Advisory Groups.

European journal of health law·2025
Same author

Conscription as a Public Health Crisis: A Missing Dimension in the Bioethics of War.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2025
Same author

Choosing to Provide: Early Medical Abortion and Clinician Conscience in Ireland.

Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·2024
Same author

Shame, health literacy and consent.

Clinical ethics·2024
Same author

Courts, rights and the critically brain-injured patient.

Journal of medical ethics·2024
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy
05:03

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy

Published on: April 17, 2020

5.6K

Consent to testing for brain death.

Barry Lyons1, Mary Donnelly2

  • 1Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland balyons@tcd.ie.

Journal of Medical Ethics
|October 25, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Consent is not required for brain death testing in the UK, according to a new Canadian guideline. However, UK law requires court authorization if there is any disagreement regarding brain death testing.

Keywords:
deathethics- medicalhuman rightsinformed consent

More Related Videos

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation
08:56

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation

Published on: March 15, 2024

1.7K
Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
12:28

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains

Published on: June 3, 2020

17.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy
05:03

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy

Published on: April 17, 2020

5.6K
Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation
08:56

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation

Published on: March 15, 2024

1.7K
Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
12:28

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains

Published on: June 3, 2020

17.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Practice Guidelines

Background:

  • A new Canadian Clinical Practice Guideline addresses brain death diagnosis and management.
  • The guideline suggests consent is unnecessary for brain death diagnostic interventions.
  • A supporting article claims UK law and court rulings align with this, citing the Battersbee case.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze and contest the interpretation of UK consent laws regarding brain death testing.
  • To clarify the legal requirements for brain death diagnosis in the UK.
  • To address the assertion that UK law and court decisions permit testing without consent.

Main Methods:

  • Legal interpretation and analysis of UK consent laws.
  • Examination of the Battersbee court judgments.
  • Critique of the supporting article's legal arguments.

Main Results:

  • The authors disagree with the interpretation that UK law excuses consent for brain death testing.
  • The Battersbee judgments do not support the claim that consent is unnecessary.
  • UK law mandates court authorization when disagreements arise over brain death testing.

Conclusions:

  • The interpretation presented in the Canadian guideline's supporting article is contested.
  • UK law requires court approval for brain death testing in cases of dispute.
  • Clinicians must seek court authorization, not assume consent is waived, when diagnosing brain death in the UK.