Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

06:36
Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
Published on: April 15, 2020
9.1K
Reliability and Measurement Error of the Qualitative Analysis of Single Leg Loading (QASLS) Tool For Unilateral Tasks
Gemma N Parry1, Lee C Herrington2, Allan G Munro1
1School of Health and Society The University of Salford.
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
|October 27, 2023
Summary
The Qualitative Analysis of Single Leg Loading (QASLS) tool demonstrates moderate to excellent reliability for assessing movement quality in unilateral tasks. Further rater training is recommended to enhance inter-rater agreement for this clinical assessment tool.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics and Movement Science
- Clinical Assessment Tools
- Musculoskeletal Injury Prevention
Background:
- Movement quality is crucial for reducing musculoskeletal injury risk in clinical and sporting settings.
- Existing assessments often focus on bilateral or jumping movements, limiting unilateral task evaluation.
- Qualitative Analysis of Single Leg Loading (QASLS) is a novel tool for unilateral tasks using a dichotomous scoring system.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the QASLS tool.
- To assess within- and between-session reliability of QASLS for unilateral movement tasks.
- To provide data on measurement error and smallest detectable difference (SDD) for the QASLS tool.
Main Methods:
- A reliability study design was employed.
- Fifteen healthy females performed single leg squat (SLS) and single leg landing (SLL) tasks.
- QASLS scoring was conducted via video playback with data collected within and between sessions (7 days apart).
- Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC), Kappa coefficients, and percentage of exact agreement (PEA%) were used for reliability analysis.
Main Results:
- Within-session reliability was good to moderate (ICC=0.67-0.87), and between-session reliability was moderate to excellent (ICC=0.69-0.93).
- Intra-rater agreement for compound QASLS scores was near perfect (k=0.85-1.00, PEA%=90-100%).
- Inter-rater agreement for compound scores showed variability (k=0.03-0.74, PEA%=43.3-90%), with lower values for SLL.
Conclusions:
- The QASLS tool exhibits moderate to excellent within- and between-session reliability for unilateral loading tasks.
- While intra-rater reliability is high, inter-rater agreement requires improvement.
- Rater education and training are recommended to enhance the overall reliability of the QASLS assessment.

