Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices
Published on: July 14, 2023
Clinical holds for cell and gene therapy trials: Risks, impact, and lessons learned
Carolyn A Wills1, Daniela Drago2,3, Robert G Pietrusko1,3
1Vor Biopharma, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA.
Abstract:
The recent increase in cell and gene therapies being developed has been coupled with a disproportionate increase in Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-mandated clinical holds. Aiming to better understand causes and secondary effects of these clinical holds on biotechnology companies, we analyzed 33 clinical holds that were publicly announced from January 2020 to December 2022. Approximately 80% of the analyzed clinical holds were formally lifted by the close of our study after an average of 6.2 months, and several trials have had significant clinical success following a hold. CAR T cell therapies accounted for nine holds, Lentiviral and AAV-based gene therapies accounted for five and 15 holds, respectively, and other cell and gene therapies accounted for four holds. The most common trigger was an adverse event or patient death. To remove a hold, protocol amendments were the most requested resolution by FDA. While there is no way to guarantee a therapy will not be placed on clinical hold, especially following unexpected adverse events, some deficiencies are avoidable. Utilizing FDA-provided resources on regulations and expectations for cell and gene therapy investigational new drug applications, inclusion of an external safety monitoring board, and a proactive risk assessment plan may prevent a clinical hold or result in a shortened duration.
Related Concept Videos
Gene Therapy
Microorganisms in Medicine and Therapeutics
Clinical Trials: Overview
Preclinical Development: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

