Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

88
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
88
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

251
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
251
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

201
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
201
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods01:14

Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods

450
Parametric survival analysis models survival data by assuming a specific probability distribution for the time until an event occurs. The Weibull and exponential distributions are two of the most commonly used methods in this context, due to their versatility and relatively straightforward application.
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
450
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

136
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
136
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Heterogeneous trajectories of executive function in clinical Alzheimer's disease: Results from the 3C study.

Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2026
Same author

Methodological approaches to account for assay changes in longitudinal biomarker analysis: insights from Alzheimer's blood biomarkers in the MEMENTO cohort.

Alzheimer's research & therapy·2026
Same author

A regularized multi-state model for covariate selection with interval-censored survival data.

Biometrics·2026
Same author

Determinants of residential pesticide contamination in vineyard regions: a structural equation modeling approach.

Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology·2026
Same author

Association of treated neovascular AMD with disability and mood disorders: A longitudinal nationwide study.

Acta ophthalmologica·2026
Same author

Maintenance of occupational therapy for individuals with dementia: Findings from a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K

Random survival forests with multivariate longitudinal endogenous covariates.

Anthony Devaux1,2,3, Catherine Helmer1, Robin Genuer4

  • 1Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, Bordeaux, France.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|October 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces DynForest, a new method for personalized medicine that predicts clinical event risk using patient history. DynForest effectively handles complex, time-dependent data for more accurate risk prediction.

Keywords:
Individual dynamic predictioncompeting riskslongitudinal datamultivariate predictorsrandom survival forestsurvival data

More Related Videos

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.4K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Personalized Medicine
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Background:

  • Predicting individual clinical event risk from complete patient history is crucial for personalized medicine.
  • Existing analytical methods struggle with numerous time-dependent predictors that have irregular, error-prone measurements and are subject to informative truncation by the event.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend competing-risk random survival forests to predict event probabilities using endogenous longitudinal predictors.
  • To develop and evaluate a method, implemented in the R package DynForest, capable of handling complex patient history data for dynamic risk prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Extended competing-risk random survival forests (DynForest) to incorporate time-dependent longitudinal predictors.
  • Internally transformed time-dependent predictors into time-fixed features using mixed models at each tree node.
  • Computed individual event probabilities by averaging leaf-specific Aalen-Johansen estimators across trees.

Main Results:

  • DynForest demonstrated effective prediction of clinical events, outperforming a joint modeling approach with two predictors.
  • The method proved superior to regression calibration when handling a large number of longitudinal predictors, accounting for informative truncation.
  • An application in dementia research showcased DynForest's utility in developing dynamic prediction tools from multimodal markers.

Conclusions:

  • DynForest provides a robust framework for dynamic risk prediction in personalized medicine, effectively managing complex longitudinal data.
  • The method allows for the quantification of marker importance in prediction models, aiding clinical interpretation.
  • DynForest offers a valuable tool for developing advanced clinical prediction models, particularly in areas like dementia research.