Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Landscape of Baseline and Acquired Genomic Alterations in Circulating Tumor DNA with Abemaciclib Alone or with
Matthew P Goetz1, Erika P Hamilton2, Mario Campone3
1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Purpose:
To identify potential predictors of response and resistance mechanisms in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor abemaciclib ± endocrine therapy (ET), baseline and acquired genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were analyzed and associated with clinical outcomes.
Experimental Design:
MONARCH 3: postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2- ABC and no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting were randomly assigned to abemaciclib or placebo plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). nextMONARCH: women with HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer that progressed on/after prior ET and chemotherapy were randomly assigned to abemaciclib alone (two doses) or plus tamoxifen. Baseline and end-of-treatment plasma samples from patients in MONARCH 3 and nextMONARCH (monotherapy arms) were analyzed to identify somatic genomic alterations. Association between genomic alterations and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was assessed.
Results:
Most patients had ≥1 genomic alteration detected in baseline ctDNA. In MONARCH 3, abemaciclib+NSAI was associated with improved mPFS versus placebo+NSAI, regardless of baseline alterations. ESR1 alterations were less frequently acquired in the abemaciclib+NSAI arm than placebo+NSAI. Acquired alterations potentially associated with resistance to abemaciclib ± NSAI included RB1 and MYC.
Conclusions:
In MONARCH 3, certain baseline ctDNA genomic alterations were prognostic for ET but not predictive of abemaciclib response. Further studies are warranted to assess whether ctDNA alterations acquired during abemaciclib treatment differ from other CDK4/6 inhibitors. Findings are hypothesis generating; further exploration is warranted into mechanisms of resistance to abemaciclib and ET. See related commentary by Wander and Bardia, p. 2008.
Insights
Genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were analyzed in advanced breast cancer patients treated with abemaciclib. Some baseline alterations predicted outcomes, while acquired alterations like RB1 and MYC may indicate resistance to treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genomics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) remains a significant clinical challenge.
- Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, such as abemaciclib, combined with endocrine therapy (ET), are standard treatments for HR+ HER2- ABC.
- Understanding mechanisms of response and resistance to abemaciclib is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify potential predictors of response and resistance mechanisms in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC treated with abemaciclib ± ET.
- To analyze baseline and acquired genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and associate them with clinical outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of baseline and end-of-treatment plasma samples from patients in the MONARCH 3 and nextMONARCH trials.
- Somatic genomic alterations in ctDNA were identified using next-generation sequencing.
- Association between genomic alterations and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was assessed.
Main Results:
- Most patients had at least one genomic alteration detected in baseline ctDNA.
- In the MONARCH 3 trial, abemaciclib plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) improved mPFS compared to placebo plus NSAI, irrespective of baseline alterations.
- Acquired genomic alterations potentially associated with resistance to abemaciclib ± NSAI included RB1 and MYC.
Conclusions:
- Certain baseline ctDNA genomic alterations were prognostic for ET but not predictive of abemaciclib response.
- Further studies are needed to investigate acquired ctDNA alterations during abemaciclib treatment and compare them with other CDK4/6 inhibitors.
- Findings are hypothesis-generating, warranting further exploration into abemaciclib and ET resistance mechanisms.
More Related Videos
13:19Quantifying Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity in a Tumor Spheroid Model: Application for Drug Discovery
Published on: April 26, 2024
08:59Looking for Driver Pathways of Acquired Resistance to Targeted Therapy: Drug Resistant Subclone Generation and Sensitivity Restoring by Gene Knock-down
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle