Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Barriers to eye donation in Aotearoa New Zealand: a novel qualitative analysis.

The New Zealand medical journal·2026
Same author

Keratitis after keratoplasty: risk modifiers, microbial resistance and outcomes in the COVID-19 era.

International ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Predictive factors for outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy in myopic eyes.

International journal of ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Rates of eye donation amongst multi-organ donors over a decade (2013-2022) in new Zealand/Aotearoa.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Corneal aberrations and anterior segment parameters in preterm children with or without a history of retinopathy of prematurity.

Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)·2025
Same author

From Dysbiosis to Disease: The Microbiome's Influence on Uveitis Pathogenesis.

Microorganisms·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
07:51

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts

Published on: October 21, 2022

1.7K

Comparing Repeatability and Agreement between Commonly Used Corneal Imaging Devices in Keratoconus.

Lize Angelo1, Akilesh Gokul1, Charles McGhee

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry
|October 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Repeatability of keratometry and pachymetry measurements for keratoconus management varied between devices. The Pentacam and Medmont showed better repeatability for keratometry, while the Revo excelled in thinnest corneal thickness measurements. Devices should not be used interchangeably.

More Related Videos

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
07:29

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis

Published on: November 12, 2015

20.0K
Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation
10:46

Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation

Published on: September 18, 2012

18.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
07:51

Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts

Published on: October 21, 2022

1.7K
Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
07:29

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis

Published on: November 12, 2015

20.0K
Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation
10:46

Doppler Optical Coherence Tomography of Retinal Circulation

Published on: September 18, 2012

18.8K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Corneal Imaging
  • Diagnostic Technology

Background:

  • Keratometry and pachymetry are crucial for diagnosing and monitoring keratoconus.
  • Several corneal imaging devices are available, necessitating comparative analysis for clinical utility.
  • Accurate measurements are vital for effective management in both primary and secondary eye care settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the repeatability and agreement of a Placido disc-based videokeratoscope against spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug tomography.
  • To compare measurement precision and inter-device agreement for key keratoconus diagnostic parameters.
  • To assess the suitability of these devices for keratoconus management in different healthcare settings.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, single-center study involving 110 eyes of 110 keratoconus patients.
  • Central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), and keratometry parameters (Kmax, Kmean, Ksteep, Kflat) were measured using three devices: a Placido disc-based videokeratoscope, spectral-domain OCT, and Scheimpflug tomography.
  • Intraobserver repeatability was assessed through three measurements per device for each parameter.

Main Results:

  • The Pentacam demonstrated the best repeatability for central corneal thickness and most keratometry parameters.
  • The Medmont showed better repeatability than the Revo for keratometry parameters.
  • The Revo exhibited the highest repeatability for thinnest corneal thickness (TCT).
  • Intraclass correlation coefficients exceeded 0.94 for all parameters across all devices.
  • Agreement between devices was generally poor, with good agreement noted only between Pentacam and Medmont for Kflat.

Conclusions:

  • The Pentacam and Medmont offer superior repeatability for keratometry measurements compared to the Revo.
  • The Revo provides the highest repeatability for TCT, potentially aiding in monitoring disease progression and assessing corneal cross-linking.
  • Significant disagreement exists between the devices, precluding their interchangeable use in clinical practice.
  • Careful consideration of device-specific performance is necessary for accurate keratoconus diagnosis and management.