Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Advanced Diffusion Imaging in The Hippocampus of Rats with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: August 14, 2019
ANALYSIS OF DEFECTS IN THE FORENSIC MEDICAL ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES DISCOVERED DURING THE EXAMINATION OF PERSONS WHO
Alina Pletenetska1, Yevhenii Varfolomeiev1, Ivan Demchenko1
1BOGOMOLETS NATIONAL MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, KYIV, UKRAINE.
Objective:
The aim: To identify the main groups of expert defects that arise during the forensic assessment of changes detected during the examination of persons who died from a traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Patients And Methods:
Materials and methods: A total of 102 repeated commission forensic medical examinations with changed conclusions in corpses with TBI were analyzed. Data processing and analysis were conducted using statistical methods.
Results:
Results: The examined forensic medical assessments of TBI with changed conclusions in corpses were categorized into the following groups: defects in estab¬lishing the diagnosis of TBI - 17.65±7.4%; defects in establishing the mechanism of TBI - 35.3±9.3%; defects in establishing the duration of TBI - 39.22±9.5%: sober - 20±12.4%; with alcohol intoxication - 80±12.4%. A combination of defects was found in 7.83±5.2% of cases. Defects that directly affected the experts' incorrect establishment of the diagnosis, mechanism, and duration of TBI were also identified.
Conclusion:
Conclusions: The largest number of changed conclusions during the forensic medical examination of corpses in cases of TBI was due to the wrongly established duration of the trauma, accounting for 39.2±9.5%, with the vast majority of cases (80±12.4%) observed against the background of alcohol intoxication. The mechanism of trauma accounted for 35.3±9.3% of the changed conclusions. The main defects were incomplete collection of material for histological examination (90.2±5.8%) and incorrect interpretation of the results of histological examination (76.48±8.2%), along with the violation of the method of sectional examination (68.6±9.0%). Different groups of expert defects predominated in the cases with an incorrectly established diagnosis of TBI, duration of trauma, and mechanism.
More Related Videos
07:21Systems Analysis of the Neuroinflammatory and Hemodynamic Response to Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: May 27, 2022
08:36Development of an Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Model Modified by Weight-Drop Method and Evidenced by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 11, 2025